Prodromou monks issue open letter on history of non-commemoration at the skete

Mt. Athos, October 12, 2017

Photo: escapegreece.com Photo: escapegreece.com
    

The Athonite Romanian skete of Prodromou (St. John the Forerunner) has released an open letter that seeks to restore the truth about what happened in connection with the brotherhood’s statement on Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew after, as the authors write, “he contributed to the legalization of the heresy of Ecumenism by way of the so-called Holy and Great Council which took place in June 2016 on Crete.”

This latest statement from the skete is meant as a response to the communiqué that was published on the Romanian Patriarchate’s Basilica News Agency in June of this year, on behalf of the skete brotherhood, in which it was denied that the skete has ceased commemoration of Patriarch Bartholomew, or that the abbot of the Great Lavra, to which the skete belongs, interfered in the life of the skete in any way, reports Odigitria.

Hieroschemank Paisios of Prodromou states, “As a member of the synaxis of the Romanian Prodromou Skete, I can confirm that I knew nothing about the publication of the given communiqué as issued from Prodromou Skete, which is a deviation from the skete’s rules,” adding that any such substantive letter must be approved by the synaxis and signed by the abbot along with two annually elected officials. The communiqué, however, was signed only by abbot Archimandrite Athanasios “and the brethren in Christ together with me.”

Thus, the hieromonk concludes, “the document is illegal and invalid.”

According to the letter, while the communiqué claims the skete never ceased commemoration of the patriarch, the meeting of the skete’s synaxis on December 4, 2016, in fact voted 5-1 to cease commemoration, with only the abbot voting against it. Beginning that day, all the clergy serving in the skete, Hieromonks Paisios, Joel, Kallinikos, and Hierodeacon Matthew, no longer commemorated the patriarch in the Divine services, as a means of insulating themselves against Ecumenism.

A week later, a 4.5-hour meeting was held with representatives of the Great Lavra and the Prodromou brotherhood, after which, having failed to convince the brothers to resume commemoration, the Lavra representatives began to threaten the dissolution of the skete’s synaxis, and the imposition of a penance on those who contributed to the decision to suspend commemoration of the patriarch.

When asked his opinion, Hieroschamamonk Julian, the elder of skete, stated that he holds holy that which did the saints, referring to St. Justin Popovich’s teaching that Ecumenism is a pan-heresy, and thus he called for a continuation of the practice of non-commemoration. According to the communiqué posted on the patriarchate’s site, this confession of the elder was coerced.

Three days later, the skete received a letter from the Lavra imposing sanctions on the skete until the members of the synaxis arrived at the Lavra and returned to the practice of commemoration. It also ordered the formation of a new synaxis. According to the open letter, this practice is against the charter of Mt. Athos, and was protested in letter by the entire synaxis, including the abbot Archimandrite Athanasios, who the brothers of the skete know to have personally confessed that the Crete Council was a heretical robber council.

The difficult situation was worsened with Archimandrite Athanasios stepping down from the abbacy, but later returning under the condition that one monk would be removed from the synaxis. According to the letter, his return did not necessitate a return to commemorating the patriarch, but on the feast of Theophany, the abbot of the Great Lavra, who was invited by Archimandrite Athanasios, commemorated the patriarch at the skete. Two weeks later, the abbot of the skete demanded that all clergy return to the practice of commemorating the patriarch, and thus Frs. Paisios, Joel, and Matthew no longer serve.

According to the letter, under Archimandrite Athanasios’ pressure, the majority of the skete brotherhood has changed its mind about the Council in Crete and now supports the commemoration of the Ecumenical Patriarch at the Divine services.

The letter goes on to dispute the communiqué’s claim that “The purported information that five monks who separated themselves from the monastic body of the Skete through their non-participation in the liturgical life have been sequestered, placed under canon, persecuted or subjected to various pressures is untrue,” and offers extensive reasoning for why the non-commemorating monks believe their choice is correct and justified.

10/12/2017

See also
Disputed Athonite statement on Crete Council sparks controversy Disputed Athonite statement on Crete Council sparks controversy Disputed Athonite statement on Crete Council sparks controversy Disputed Athonite statement on Crete Council sparks controversy
The 206th Extraordinary Double Sacred Synaxis of the Holy Mountain, consisting of twenty extraordinary and ordinary representatives of the Holy Community met on June 17/30 to analyze a text, a translation of which is available on the blog Mystagogy. It is known in the Church of Greece that the text was composed not at the session itself, but beforehand by Archimandrite Vasileios (Gondikakis), the former abbot of both Stavronikita and Iveron Monasteries, who is known to be close to the patriarchate in Constantinople. Although the text has been issued on behalf of the entire Sacred Community, it is also know that several of the Athonite monasteries disputed the document.
Romanian skete on Mt. Athos denies claims it has ceased commemoration of Ecumenical Patriarch Romanian skete on Mt. Athos denies claims it has ceased commemoration of Ecumenical Patriarch Romanian skete on Mt. Athos denies claims it has ceased commemoration of Ecumenical Patriarch Romanian skete on Mt. Athos denies claims it has ceased commemoration of Ecumenical Patriarch
The Romanian Prodromou (St. John the Forerunner) Skete on Mt. Athos has issued a communiqué clarifying its stance in regards to the mountain’s ruling hierarch, His All-Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, denying that it has ceased commemorating his name in the Divine services.
Non-commemorating Athonite monks told they must leave their cells Non-commemorating Athonite monks told they must leave their cells Non-commemorating Athonite monks told they must leave their cells Non-commemorating Athonite monks told they must leave their cells
The situation has intensified on Mt. Athos after more than fifty cells ceased commemoration during the Divine services of His All-Holiness Patriarch Bartholomew, the ruling bishop of the Holy Mountain.
Comments
Editor10/13/2017 11:33 pm
No, Anthony, you are wrong. They are not heroes. They are not non-commemorators--they are //schismatics//. They commemorate a non-canonical bishop. They have no communion with any of the other monasteries on the Holy Mountain. True strugglers against Ecumenism such as Fr. Peter Heers, Fr. Theodore Zisis, and Met. Hierotheos Vlachos have no communion with them and do not agree with their schismatic stance. You are making the same mistake as those who attack people like Fr. Theodore Zisis--failing to distinguish between non-commemorating and schisming. Non-commemorating is based in canon law; schisming is a grave sin.
Anthony10/13/2017 1:53 pm
@Ed. Greetings to you my most wonderful beloved! The monks indeed are heroes since they ceased commemorating Constantinople following the latter's persistent errors in dabbling in and promulgating the heresy of ecumenism. That is only right since all saints who have spoken on ecumenism condemn it as heretical. It is up to Constantinople to repent of the horror show they have created.
Editor10/13/2017 10:55 am
Anthony, you are incorrect here. Esphigmenou has not simply ceased commemoration, but has actually entered into schism by joining a non-canonical jurisdiction. They have zeal, but not according to knowledge. They are not heroes to be emulated.
Anthony 10/12/2017 10:41 pm
Sorry but all monasteries on Athos should follow their all-Holinesses in Esfigmenou and cease commemoration of the heresiarch of Constantinople immediately - and when he starts foaming at the mouth and threatens them with excommunication and eviction whilst feigning humility, let them answer him in rejoinder with one loud voice as did their holinesses in Esfigmenou: ''MOLON LABE!''
Here you can leave your comment on the present article, not exceeding 700 characters. All comments will be read by the editors of OrthoChristian.Com.
Enter through FaceBook , or enter your information:
Your name:
Your e-mail:
Enter the digits, seen on picture:

Characters remaining: 700

×