US State Department on Ukraine: ‘Any Decision on Autocephaly Is an Internal Church Matter’

Source: Strategic Culture Foundation

September 21, 2018

    

Last week the website of Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko posted an account of his meeting in Kiev with Ambassador Sam Brownback, former US Senator and Governor of Kansas, currently Ambassador at Large for International Religious Freedom. According to the posting, “President Poroshenko outlined the measures taken to establish the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church. The Head of State thanked the American party [i.e., Brownback] for an active support in this process.” Moreover, according to Kiev, Brownback assured Poroshenko that the United States would further support Ukraine in its struggle for “the right to have the Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church.”

Poroshenko’s administration thus claimed explicit and public American official endorsement for his quest for the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Constantinople to grant autocephaly (complete self-rule among the various member Churches of the Orthodox Christian communion) to a schismatic body headed by self-styled “Patriarch Filaret” Denysenko – an entity recognized as canonical by no local Orthodox church in the world, including (as of this writing) by the Ecumenical Patriarchate itself. As noted in this space two months ago when hardly anyone was paying attention, this effort by Poroshenko, Denysenko, and their supporters is part of a two-pronged attack against Russia and against the Holy Orthodox Church itself, in part to further the agenda of academic purveyors of moral/sexual LGBT and “genderqueer” theology like “Orthodoxy in Dialogue” and the hardly less revolutionary “Orthodox Christian Studies Center” at Fordham University – both, unsurprisingly, staunch supporters of Constantinople’s neo-papal pretensions.

... Read the rest at Strategic Culture Foundation.

See also
Faith, power, money: Conflicting agendas in Ukraine Church politics Faith, power, money: Conflicting agendas in Ukraine Church politics
James George Jatras
Faith, power, money: Conflicting agendas in Ukraine Church politics Faith, power, money: Conflicting agendas in Ukraine Church politics
James George Jatras
One of the most contentious and significant controversies in the world today is also one of the least-well understood. In part, this is because it involves matters of faith and church governance, the importance of which many people, especially some of a secular mind who scorn mere “religion,” tend to underestimate.
A Canon Aimed at Moscow? A Canon Aimed at Moscow?
Nun Cornelia (Rees)
A Canon Aimed at Moscow? A Canon Aimed at Moscow?
Nun Cornelia (Rees)
Will Constantinople go ahead and fulfil President Petro Poroshenko’s request that an autocephalous Church be granted in the Ukraine, making that country separate from Russia not only in body but also in soul?
Constantinople delegation snubs Ukrainian Church’s celebrations, instead meets with Poroshenko, says autocephaly is the goal Constantinople delegation snubs Ukrainian Church’s celebrations, instead meets with Poroshenko, says autocephaly is the goal Constantinople delegation snubs Ukrainian Church’s celebrations, instead meets with Poroshenko, says autocephaly is the goal Constantinople delegation snubs Ukrainian Church’s celebrations, instead meets with Poroshenko, says autocephaly is the goal
While the stance of the Russian Orthodox Church, the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church under His Beatitude Metropolitan Onuphry of Kiev and All Ukraine, and the stance of all Local Autocephalous Churches around the world is quite clear on the matter, the stance of the EP itself is rather more murky, though a clear picture is perhaps slowly emerging, especially after the meeting between EP representatives and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko over the weekend.

Subscribe
to our mailing list

* indicates required
×