Forefeast of the Transfiguration. Martyr Eusignius of Antioch (362).
Hieromartyrs Antherus (236) and Fabian (250), popes of Rome. Martyr Pontius, at Cimella in Gaul (ca. 257). Righteous Nonna, mother of St. Gregory the Theologian (374). Monk-martyr Job the Gorge-dweller, on the Mezen River (Solovki) (1628). Martyrs Cantidius, Cantidian, and Sibelius, of Egypt (4th c.).
New Martyrs Eudocia Sheikova, Daria Timagina, Daria Ulybina, and Maria of Diveyevo, novices, at Puzo (1919). New Hieromartyr Simon (Shleyev), bishop of Ufa (1921).
Martyr Oswald, king of Northumbria (642). St. Euthymius, patriarch of Constantinople (917). New Martyr Christos of Preveza, at Kos (1668). St. Eugenius, monk, of Anatolia (1682). Uncovering of the relics of St. Arsenius the New, of Paros (1967).
Friday. [II Cor. 4:13-18; Matt. 24:27-33, 42-51]
Watch; for ye know not, what hour
your Lord doth come. If only this were remembered,
there would be no sinners. But it is not remembered,
although everyone knows that it is unquestionably true.
Even the strictest ascetics were not strong enough to
easily keep this in mind, and made efforts to fix it in
their consciousness so that it would not leave—one
kept a coffin in his cell, another begged his co-ascetics
to ask about his coffin and grave, another kept pictures
of death and judgment, another in other ways. If death
does not touch a soul, the soul does not remember it. But
in no way can what immediately follows death not touch a
soul; a soul cannot but be concerned about this, since it
is the judgment of its fate for eternal ages. Why does a
soul not remember this? It deceives itself that death will
come not soon, and that perhaps somehow things won’t
go badly for us. How bitter! It goes without saying that a
soul which abides in such thoughts is careless and
self-indulgent. So, how can it think that judgment will go
favorably for it? No, one must behave like a student who
is facing an exam: no matter what he does, the exam does
not leave his head; such remembrance does not allow him to
waste even a minute in vain, and he uses all his time to
prepare for the exam. When will we acquire a mindset like
this!
Saturday. [I Cor. 1:3-9; Matt. 19:3-12]
The Lord says that originally God
Himself blessed the marriage union, and put this law into
our nature. About those who do not want to get married He
said: He that is able to receive it, let him receive
it. It is clear that although He admitted that
marriage is a natural law, it is not so indispensable and
inescapable that there is no room for celibacy. He allows
celibacy, but guards it with a condition which brings it
nearer to the law of nature. A eunuch from birth is
celibate according to a natural law; but he who by his own
will puts himself in the same state as that of the natural
eunuch’s by birth without the participation of will,
moves onto one level with him in relation to natural
needs. Consequently, in this sense, both the former and
the latter are natural celibates. Why is the state of a
spiritual eunuch—self-imposed
celibacy—considered unnatural? Because people do not
understand nature. For them “natural” means
what is natural for the body, but what is natural for the
spirit, and what becomes natural [for the body] as a
consequence of the spirit’s influence, people do not
want to consider natural. It would be a different matter
if these were all materialists, but this is not so.
Discuss some other subject with them and they will speak
reasonably.