Poroshenko 2.0: Montenegrin president intends to seek autocephaly for Montenegrin church

Podgorica, Montenegro, December 25, 2018

Photo: spzh.news Photo: spzh.news
    

President Milo Đukanović of Montenegro intends to undertake a push for the recognition of the autocephaly of the schismatic “Montenegrin Orthodox Church,” as Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko has done in his country.

The president spoke of restoring the autocephaly that Montenegro once had in an interview on the TV program Live Truth, RTCG reports.

The role of the Serbian Orthodox Church in relation to Montenegro, he believes, is extremely destructive, despite the state policy of Serbia.

“The Serbian Orthodox Church very aggressively undermines Montenegrin independence. I believe it is necessary to continue work on restoring the autocephalous Montenegrin Orthodox Church, and the state will deal with this and bear responsibility for it,” Đukanović explained.

Montenegrin authorities are in sharp disagreement with the Serbian Church, which the vast majority of Montenegrin Orthodox belong to, and His Eminence Metropolitan Amfilohije of Montenegro and the Littoral in particular.

“Of course, [the Montenegrin Orthodox Church] should be assisted by the state. I have said many times that for me personally the historical autocephaly of the Montenegrin Orthodox Church is an undeniable fact. I understand that the circumstances that preceded its abolition were the same ones that we canceled by the decision of May 21, 2006,” the President said, as RIA-Novosti reports, referring to the referendum on withdrawing from the union with Serbia.

However, the confessional issue should not be entrusted entirely to the state, so the “Montenegrin Church” should “do much more for its own organization and to raise its authority among the local population and the international community.”

“I believe that in the interests of the future of Montenegro and its stability, which the Church can significantly contribute to, it is necessary to continue working on a systematic, fundamental, democratically justified renewal of the autocephalous Montenegrin Orthodox Church, and I think that the state is responsible for this, is engaged in this, and, in any case, will help the successful implementation of this matter,” the Montenegrin President stressed.

Constantinople’s actions in Ukraine have also emboldened other schismatic groups throughout the Orthodox world. In September, the head of the schismatic “Belarusian Autocephalous Orthodox Church” said that the granting of a tomos of autocephaly to Ukrainian schismatics should have an impact on Belarus as well, and their goal is to also be recognized as autocephalous.

The schismatic “Macedonian Orthodox Church,” another breakaway from the Serbian Church is also pushing for autocephaly. It initially appealed to the Bulgarian Church last November, but after Poroshenko’s appeal to Constantinople in April, the Macedonian church and state also appealed to Constantinople.

Patriarch Bartholomew initially announced that he would handle the Macedonian situation, but later reneged, saying Macedonia is the canonical sphere of the Serbian Church. However, as Constantinople made clear in its dealings in Ukraine and its rehabilitation of anathematized Ukrainian schismatics, it reserves the right to intervene anytime, anywhere.

***

The “Montenegrin Orthodox Church” was created in 1993 by Antonije Abramović, a defrocked cleric of the Serbian Orthodox Church, who declared himself the Metropolitan of Montenegro. The church claims to be the legitimate successor to the autocephalous Montenegrin Church that operated until the annexation of the Kingdom of Montenegro into the Kingdom of Yugoslavia in 1918.

As of 2009, 29.36% of Montenegro’s Orthodox belong to the schismatic church, while 70.64% belong to the canonical Serbian Church.

The “Montenegrin Church” is currently led by Miraš Dedeić who was suspended by the Greek Orthodox Church for adultery, embezzlement, and creating a separate Serbian community within his Greek parish. He was tonsured as a monk and elevated to the rank of archimandrite by the schismatic “Macedonian Orthodox Church” and consecrated as a bishop by the schismatic “Bulgarian Alternative Orthodox Church,” after which he took over the “Montenegrin Orthodox Church.”

In 1997, he was excommunicated by the Holy Synod of the Patriarchate of Constantinople, although any decision can be overturned by Constantinople. Moreover, the “Montenegrin Church” was in communion with the schismatic “Kiev Patriarchate” which was rehabilitated and turned into a jurisdiction of Constantinople before merging into the newly-created Ukrainian nationalist church, so there could be grounds for Constantinople to deem the “Montenegrin Church” canonical.

Follow us on Facebook!

12/25/2018

See also
Constantinople’s lust for power is catastrophic for Orthodoxy—Met. Amfilohije of Montenegro Constantinople’s lust for power is catastrophic for Orthodoxy—Met. Amfilohije of Montenegro Constantinople’s lust for power is catastrophic for Orthodoxy—Met. Amfilohije of Montenegro Constantinople’s lust for power is catastrophic for Orthodoxy—Met. Amfilohije of Montenegro
The actions of the Patriarchate in Constantinople in Ukraine over the past few months could have disastrous consequences for the future of all Orthodoxy, His Eminence Metropolitan Amfilohije of Montenegro and the Littoral said during the Sunday service in the Church of St. Nicholas in Bandić, Montenegro.
In True Borgia Style In True Borgia Style
Taras Melnick
In True Borgia Style In True Borgia Style
The “unification council” in Kiev: how it went, conclusions and prospects
Taras Melnick
Only a few days had passed after the council when the information space began shocking everyone with scandalous and absolutely unexpected announcements and publications made by participants of the above event.
Constantinople’s actions on eve of “council” invalidate claim that three branches of Ukrainian Orthodoxy were united Constantinople’s actions on eve of “council” invalidate claim that three branches of Ukrainian Orthodoxy were united Constantinople’s actions on eve of “council” invalidate claim that three branches of Ukrainian Orthodoxy were united Constantinople’s actions on eve of “council” invalidate claim that three branches of Ukrainian Orthodoxy were united
Alexander Drabinko, the former Metropolitan of Pereyaslav-Khmelnitsky and Vishnev, one of the two hierarchs in question, published a letter from Pat. Bartholomew on his personal Facebook page, showing that on the eve of the “council,” he was, in fact, received into the jurisdiction of the Patriarchate of Constantinople.
“The Patriarch of Constantinople Has No Canonical Right to Convene Any Assembly in Ukraine” “The Patriarch of Constantinople Has No Canonical Right to Convene Any Assembly in Ukraine”
Resolutions of the Holy Synod of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, December 7, 2018
“The Patriarch of Constantinople Has No Canonical Right to Convene Any Assembly in Ukraine” “The Patriarch of Constantinople Has No Canonical Right to Convene Any Assembly in Ukraine”
Resolutions of the Holy Synod of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, December 7, 2018
On December 7, 2018, a session of the Holy Synod of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church was held in the residence of the primate of the UOC on the territory of the Holy Dormition-Kiev Caves Lavra in which the hierarchs addressed the upcoming so-called “unification council” and the Ukrainian state’s increasing interference in the life of and persecution against the Church.
Not only can we give, but we can also take away autocephaly—Abp. Job (Getcha) Not only can we give, but we can also take away autocephaly—Abp. Job (Getcha) Not only can we give, but we can also take away autocephaly—Abp. Job (Getcha) Not only can we give, but we can also take away autocephaly—Abp. Job (Getcha)
Archbishop Job (Getcha), a hierarch of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, gave an interview with the BBCrecently in which he spoke about the crisis in Ukraine and the prerogatives of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
Coming Back to Oneself: An Orthodox Method for the Reconciliation of the Lapsed in the Light of the Recent Ukrainian Issue Coming Back to Oneself: An Orthodox Method for the Reconciliation of the Lapsed in the Light of the Recent Ukrainian Issue
Fr. Nemanja S. Mrdjenovic
Coming Back to Oneself: An Orthodox Method for the Reconciliation of the Lapsed in the Light of the Recent Ukrainian Issue Coming Back to Oneself
An Orthodox Method for the Reconciliation of the Lapsed in the Light of the Recent Ukrainian Issue
Fr. Nemanja S. Mrdjenovic
The principal reason for this trend of inefficiency is the fact that the Church is not evoking the experience of the Fathers to receive back those that came to themselves but is rather using a modern, secular, and predominantly ecumenist method of political compromise.

Subscribe
to our mailing list

* indicates required
×