Washington, D.C., October 30, 2023
Photo: robertamsterdam.com
Robert Amsterdam, whose law firm AMSTERDAM & PARTNERS LLP is offering pro bono defense to the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church as it faces persecution state and local authorities, penned a warning letter to the deputies of the Ukrainian Parliament last week.
Amsterdam appeared on Tucker Carlson’s show Tucker on X on Thursday, October 26, to talk about the persecution and the deafening silence of the American government.
On the same day, Amsterdam published his open letter to the Verkhovna Rada, emphasizing that its fervent desire to ban the majority religion of its own people constitutes a violation of the right to freedom of religion, which could have negative consequences both for Ukraine as a whole and for individual deputies.
People who violate such basic human rights often fall under sanctions of even face criminal prosecution, the lawyer writes.
Read his full letter, published on the AMSTERDAM & PARTNERS LLP site:
Ruslan Stefanchuk
Chairman, Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy
Oleksandr Kornienko,
1st Deputy Chairman, Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy
Olena Kondratiuk,
2nd Deputy Chairwoman, Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy
Deputies of the Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy
October 24, 2023
Chairman Stefanchuk, Deputy Chairman Kornieno, Chairwoman Okdratiuk, and Deputies of the Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy:
The vote of 267 members of the Verkhovna Rada in favor of draft law 8371 on Friday, October 20th is a grave violation of international human rights law that could have serious consequences both for Ukraine’s sovereignty and for you personally. As you know, draft law 8371 bans the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) from the territory of Ukraine. In so doing, it violates the internationally protected right of the freedom of religion. Before the law undergoes a second reading, I write to make you aware of applicable international law and the consequences of your support for this dangerous bill.
If enacted, this legislation would deny the Ukrainian people of one of the most basic human rights—the freedom of religion. It would require people of one faith to abandon their church and instead worship under the government’s preferred branch of Orthodoxy—the newly established Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU). Telling people how they must worship is blatantly inconsistent with international human rights.
Ukraine has entered into solemn international legal commitments to respect and preserve international human rights, including the freedom of religion. This guarantee has its origins in the aftermath of WWII, which waw the last time a significant religion was banned anywhere in Europe. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948, binds all countries as a matter of customary international law and guarantees:
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which Ukraine ratified on November 12, 1973 requires that Ukraine:
“respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction… the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.”
Significantly, no derogation from this absolute commitment is permissible, even in time of war or other national emergency.
Article 9 of the European Convention of Human Rights, which Ukraine ratified on July 17, 1997, obligates Ukraine to
“secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction” the “right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion,” including the freedom, “either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.”
Draft law 8371 violates these most basic commitments of the Ukrainian nation. It privileges a state-selected and backed branch of Orthodoxy by banning the preferred institution of worship of millions of Ukrainians. There is no justification that can relieve Ukraine of these binding legal commitments. Neither historical religious ties nor the possibility of foreign influence can override the freedom of religion. In a democratic society, it is not for the state to judge canonical links to other branches of Orthodoxy or to invoke national security without justification. No evidence has been presented that would demonstrate foreign control of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
At the time the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU) was granted Tomos by Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I, then President Poroshenko made a firm commitment to protect the freedom of religion of all Ukrainians. Speaking at a press conference after the establishment of the new church, he indicated that “it is not the business of secular authorities to determine” where and how people should worship. To do so would “violate interfaith relations….and can completely discredit the idea of creating a local church.” He committed that the government would “take a neutral position” and “be categorically against” any effort to privilege the OCU over the UOC. Today, the Verkhovna Rada must live up to those promises.
Passage of this law could have grave consequences for Ukraine’s sovereignty and political future. Since Russia’s invasion, Ukraine has relied on the UN Charter and other rules of international law affirm its independence. Ukraine’s violation of international law by banning a church would render Ukraine in pari delicto (to have unclean hands), undercutting its ability to invoke international law against Russia. Maintaining the legal and moral high ground is absolutely essential to Ukraine’s self-defense and independence. Further, passage of draft law 8371 undermines Ukraine’s candidacy to join the European Union. The Copenhagen Criteria for EU membership “require that the candidate country has achieved stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for and protection of minorities.” To be admitted to the EU, a country must comply with the European Convention on Human Rights, including the freedom of religion. This legislation would render Ukraine inadmissible to the EU, again undermining the country’s future prospects. Your support for this legislation may also render you personally liable for violating the human rights of your own people. Key allies of Ukraine, including the US, the EU and the UK routinely impose individual sanctions on the perpetrators of human rights violations far less egregious than those contained in draft law 8371. Such sanctions typically range from travel bans to the freezing or seizure of assets, and can have profound impact on the lives and finances of those responsible. In addition, some countries committed to upholding human rights bring criminal charges against the perpetrators of human rights abuses in their own courts under the principle of universal jurisdiction. Members of the Verkhovna Rada who continue to support this legislation may someday find themselves in a foreign court facing criminal conviction. As the second reading of draft law 8371 approaches, you and the Verkhovna Rada have a stark choice. You may denounce this legislation, and uphold international law by preserving the right of freedom of religion of your own people. Or you may support the bill, violating one of the most basic human rights and, in so doing, undermine Ukraine’s political future and expose yourself to sanctions or even criminal prosecution. The choice should be very clear.
Sincerely,
Robert Amsterdam
Follow OrthoChristian on Twitter, Vkontakte, Telegram, WhatsApp, MeWe, and Gab!
