Metropolis of Piraeus calls on Greek Holy Synod not to recognize Ukrainian schismatics

Piraeus, Greece, January 23, 2019

Photo: vimaorthodoxias.gr Photo: vimaorthodoxias.gr
    

The Metropolis of Piraeus, headed by His Eminence Metropolitan Seraphim of Piraeus, has called on the Holy Synod of the Greek Orthodox Church not to recognize the so-called “Orthodox Church of Ukraine” created by Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople and President Petro Poroshenko of Ukraine on December 15.

The Metropolis’ statement has been posted on vimaorthodoxias.gr.

Following the mid-December “unification council,” Pat. Bartholomew personally wrote to the hierarchs of all the world’s Local Orthodox Churches, asking them to accept the results of the “council” and to begin commemorating “Metropolitan” Epiphany Dumenko, the primate of the new nationalist church, at the Divine services.

Thus far, the Polish, Serbian, and Antiochian Churches have officially rejected this request, and His Beatitude Archbishop Chrysostomos of Cyprus has also said that he will not commemorate Epiphany Dumenko. The Greek Synod met on December 8, but in view of the seriousness of the Ukrainian issue, it decided to refer the issue to the broader Bishops’ Council to get more hierarchs involved in the decision.

The Metropolis notes that “the Ecumenical Patriarchate did not take into account the warm calls and appeals of many other Local Orthodox Churches that have pointed out that the only appropriate way to resolve the Ukrainian issue is through dialogue and a council, with the pan-Orthodox participation of all the Local Churches.”

Synods, primates, and hierarchs from around the Orthodox world have repeatedly called for Constantinople to handle the issue in a conciliar fashion, but Constantinople has continually refused to do so.

Noting that Constantinople’s actions have already led to the Russian Church breaking communion with the Patriarchate of Constantinople, Met. Seraphim states: “It is now obvious that world Orthodoxy, following the unilateral decision of the Ecumenical Patriarchate to grant autocephalous status to a ‘church’ that is nothing more than a patchwork of schismatic, deposed, and self-consecrated bishops, is quickly being led to a new great schism, perhaps the second great schism after that of 1054, with incalculable ecclesiastical consequences for pan-Orthodox unity and to the utmost joy of its enemies.”

Further, the diocese states that the situation with Ukrainian autocephaly has no historical precedent in Church history, as the canonical Church headed by His Beatitude Metropolitan Onuphry of Kiev and All Ukraine did not appeal for autocephaly and has been ignored by Constantinople. While the majority of the Ukrainian population belongs to the canonical Church, Constantinople granted autocephaly to a small group of fake “bishops,” the Greek Metropolis writes.

Further, behind this ignoring of the canonical Church lies political and geostrategic considerations, the Metropolis writes, as Met. Seraphim has spoken about before. This is clearly demonstrated, it is argued, by the fact that Poroshenko thanked the U.S. for its support in the autocephaly process and from statements made by the U.S. State Department.

The Metropolis also writes, as Met. Seraphim has before, that Pat. Bartholomew had no canonical right to restore the defrocked and anathematized Ukrainian schismatics, undoing the canonically-justified decisions of the Moscow Patriarchate. Moreover, the granting of autocephaly to them constitutes an intervention in the territory of the Russian Orthodox Church, and Constantinople’s involvement with schismatics hinders its coordinating, unifying role. Nothing in the past three centuries in any way indicates that the Kiev Metropolia belonged to Constantinople, and all the Local Churches have accepted that Ukraine is the canonical territory of the Russian Orthodox Church.

“This unanimity expresses the pan-Orthodox ecclesiastical consciousness, but now the Ecumenical Patriarchate paradoxically and improperly disputes and cancels it with a single stroke of a pen, essentially in blatant contradiction with itself!” the statement reads.

And, as the Metropolis notes, the schism is only deepening in Ukraine, with churches being seized and bishops, priests, monks, and laity being persecuted.

It further notes the irony that while persecution is raging, Pat. Barthomew writes letters to the primates of the Orthodox Churches, asking them to recognize this new persecuting church. As the Metropolis notes, several Churches have already rejected this request, and the Churches of Alexandria, Jerusalem, and Bulgaria are expected to follow suit.

Therefore, in view of the upcoming session of the Bishop’s Council of the Greek Orthodox Church, the date of which is not indicated,

with a sense of anguish and responsibility for the pan-Orthodox unity of our Church, we would like to appeal to our honorable hierarchs and express our concerns about this major issue. We would like to kindly ask our hierarchs to do their duty with a high sense of responsibility. We ask them to examine the issue with sobriety, fear of God, and love for the Church, taking into account the sacred canons and all that we have pointed out above, serving pan-Orthodox unity and the Church’s interest.

The Metropolis also asks the hierarchs to take into account:

  • That President Poroshenko, who initiated and guided the autocephaly process, is a Uniate, as is clear from widely-publicized photos showing him receiving communion from the head of the Ukrainian Uniate church;

Photo: mtdata.ru Photo: mtdata.ru
    

  • That the schismatic “Metropolitan” Epiphany has specifically called for cooperation with the Uniates;

  • That Philaret Denisenko was defrocked and anathematized by the Russian Orthodox Church for his schismatic activity and other serious moral concerns and thus there can be no canonical ordinations in his “Kiev Patriarchate” that resembles the communists’ Living Church;

  • And that the Pat. Bartholomew himself explicitly acknowledged to His Holiness Patriarch Alexei II of Moscow and All Russia that the Russian Church had “exclusive competence” to deal with and sanction Denisenko.

The Metropolis concludes: “We want to believe that our hierarchs will be lifted up in the circumstances and will not recognize the new schismatic ‘church’ under ‘Metropolitan’ Epiphany, following the sacred canons, which they promised to observe with fearful vows on the day of their consecration.”

Several other individual Greek hierarchs have spoken out against the actions of Constantinople and the Ukrainian state over the past several months, including the Metropolitans Nektarios of Corfu, Paxoi, and the Diapontian Islands, Seraphim of Kythira, and Ambrose of Kalavryta.

Follow us on Facebook!

1/23/2019

See also
“The unity of the Orthodox Church is based not on the sole, Papist principle, but on conciliarity”—Georgian hierarch “The unity of the Orthodox Church is based not on the sole, Papist principle, but on conciliarity”—Georgian hierarch “The unity of the Orthodox Church is based not on the sole, Papist principle, but on conciliarity”—Georgian hierarch “The unity of the Orthodox Church is based not on the sole, Papist principle, but on conciliarity”—Georgian hierarch
The development of events in the Ukraine are “an acute problem that has arisen in the world Orthodox Church,” with the canonical and majority Church being ignored and the situation being exacerbated by the statements and interference of political figures, His Eminence Metropolitan John of Rustavi of the Georgian Orthodox Church wrote on his Facebook page.
There is no new church, tomos was given to “Kiev Patriarchate,” Philaret Denisenko declares There is no new church, tomos was given to “Kiev Patriarchate,” Philaret Denisenko declares There is no new church, tomos was given to “Kiev Patriarchate,” Philaret Denisenko declares There is no new church, tomos was given to “Kiev Patriarchate,” Philaret Denisenko declares
Now, perhaps for the first time, Denisenko has stated this conviction publicly—that a new church was not created, but, in fact, the tomos of autocephaly was given to the “Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Kiev Patriarchate.”
Getting to the Essence. A Look at the Schism Through the Eyes of Professor Osipov Getting to the Essence. A Look at the Schism Through the Eyes of Professor Osipov
Professor Alexei Osipov
Getting to the Essence. A Look at the Schism Through the Eyes of Professor Osipov Getting to the Essence. A Look at the Schism Through the Eyes of Professor Osipov
Professor Alexei Osipov
The following is a translated transcript of a Spas (Savior) Orthodox TV channel special edition of their program, “Straight to the essence”. In these extremely disturbing times, people want to hear a familiar, trusted voice of experience and sound theology. Professor Osipov is that voice.
A Canonical Crisis in the Orthodox Church A Canonical Crisis in the Orthodox Church
Met. Jonah (Paffhausen)
A Canonical Crisis in the Orthodox Church A Canonical Crisis in the Orthodox Church
Primacy, Conciliarity and the Ecumenical Patriarchate
Metropolitan Jonah (Paffhausen)
The actions of the Patriarchate of Constantinople (EP) in its process of granting a Tomos of autocephaly to the schismatic groups in Ukraine have created a canonical crisis.
Patriarch of Jerusalem did not concelebrate with Ukrainian schismatics (+ VIDEO) Patriarch of Jerusalem did not concelebrate with Ukrainian schismatics (+ VIDEO) Patriarch of Jerusalem did not concelebrate with Ukrainian schismatics (+ VIDEO) Patriarch of Jerusalem did not concelebrate with Ukrainian schismatics (+ VIDEO)

His Beatitude Patriarch Theophilos III of Jerusalem celebrated the great feast of Theophany today in the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. Notably, he did not concelebrate with any representatives from the Ukrainian schismatic church.
Met. Kallistos (Ware): Crete was far from pan-Orthodox; Constantinople gave autocephaly to schismatics Met. Kallistos (Ware): Crete was far from pan-Orthodox; Constantinople gave autocephaly to schismatics Met. Kallistos (Ware): Crete was far from pan-Orthodox; Constantinople gave autocephaly to schismatics Met. Kallistos (Ware): Crete was far from pan-Orthodox; Constantinople gave autocephaly to schismatics
Met. Kallistos went over the history of primacy and synodality in the Church and reflected upon the current state of the Church, making especially interesting comments on 2016’s Crete Council and the current crisis created by Constantinople’s interference in the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
Georgian Metropolitan: We can’t serve with anathematized and self-proclaimed bishops Georgian Metropolitan: We can’t serve with anathematized and self-proclaimed bishops Georgian Metropolitan: We can’t serve with anathematized and self-proclaimed bishops Georgian Metropolitan: We can’t serve with anathematized and self-proclaimed bishops
In considering Patriarch Bartholomew’s request to recognize the results of December 15’s “unification council” and to commemorate “Metropolitan” Epiphany Dumenko as the head of the so-called “Orthodox Church of Ukraine,” it is first necessary to establish the canonicity of the clergy of the new nationalist church and to carefully study the text of the tomos they received on January 6, believes Metropolitan Nikoloz (Pachuashvili) of Akhalkalaki, Kumurdo and Kari of the Georgian Orthodox Church.
Greek Synod declines to recognize Ukrainian schismatics, refers issue to broader Bishops’ Council Greek Synod declines to recognize Ukrainian schismatics, refers issue to broader Bishops’ Council Greek Synod declines to recognize Ukrainian schismatics, refers issue to broader Bishops’ Council Greek Synod declines to recognize Ukrainian schismatics, refers issue to broader Bishops’ Council
The Holy Synod of the Greek Orthodox Church met today, taking into consideration Patriarch Bartholomew’s request to His Beatitude Archbishop Ieronymos of Athens to recognize and commemorate the primate of the new Ukrainian nationalist church “Metropolitan” Epiphany Dumenko.
Polish Church rejects Pat. Bartholomew’s request to recognize new Ukrainian church Polish Church rejects Pat. Bartholomew’s request to recognize new Ukrainian church Polish Church rejects Pat. Bartholomew’s request to recognize new Ukrainian church Polish Church rejects Pat. Bartholomew’s request to recognize new Ukrainian church
The Polish primate also wrote that Pat. Bartholomew has acted in defiance of the canonical tradition and that the Ukrainian schismatics lack the grace of ordination. Met. Sawa and the Polish Church have been among the strongest supporters of the canonical Ukrainian Church and its primate His Beatitude Metropolitan Onuphry of Kiev and All Ukraine and are the first to publicly reject the results of the “unification council.”

Subscribe
to our mailing list

* indicates required
×