Patriarch: Russian Orthodox Church shunned Crete’s Pan-Orthodox Council to avoid schism

Source: TASS

Moscow, November 22, 2016.

Senior Orthodox clergy at the airport of Chania in the Greek island of Crete © Holy and Great Council via AP Senior Orthodox clergy at the airport of Chania in the Greek island of Crete © Holy and Great Council via AP
    

The Russian Orthodox Church made a last-minute decision to stay away from the Holy and Great Council of the Orthodox Church, which took place on Crete, Greece, in July 2016 in a bid to avert a split, Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia Kirill told journalists ahead of his 70th birthday.

"Divisions followed almost every Council in history. They took place even after Ecumenical Councils. Therefore, nowadays we had to avert the risks of creating a new split. That is precisely why we agreed to adopting all the decisions by consensus. However, as it turned out at a meeting of the Church primates in Geneva, two Churches - the Church of Antioch and the Georgian Orthodox Church -broke the consensus by refusing to sign very important documents," Patriarch Kirill explained.

"Then the Serbian Orthodox Church said that it was necessary to postpone the Council. The Bulgarian Church refused to attend the gathering. The Church of Antioch and the Georgian Church followed suit. When we received all that information, we sent a letter to Constantinople suggesting that an urgent pan-Orthodox conference be convened to discuss our future steps and decide on what we are supposed to do because it was impossible to assemble the Council without consensus," the head of the Russian Orthodox Church went on to say.

A fundamental principle, which the primates of the local Orthodox Churches adopted at the pan-Orthodox Council, was that all the documents should be approved by consensus with an aim to avoid differences and divisions. "We stated once again that the documents which were supposed to be presented to the Council (on Crete) did not suit us in their present form and that we had serious amendments to those documents. We received a very impolite reply, which said that the Council would take place anyway," Patriarch Kirill went on to say.

"If the Council takes place in the absence of the necessary consensus, it means that we are giving up the common principles, which all of us approved. Besides, it would mean that we are simply creating conditions for a split in Orthodox Christianity," the patriarch explained. He said that representatives of some Orthodox Churches had still travelled to Crete to attend the Council while others had refused: that automatically deprived that Council of its pan-Orthodox status. It was under those circumstances that our (Russian) Orthodox Church decided to stay away from the Council," the Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia stressed.

Further action

"But we honor the event that took place on Crete. We certainly have our own reservations and amendments. Our Biblical-Theological Commission has certainly studied the documents adopted by the Crete Council and has prepared amendments to them," Patriarch Kirill elaborated. According to him, the next Primates’ Council will study them in detail in order to be able to make its own proposals.

"We consider the Crete Council to be part of the process. Today, in the absence of a whole number of churches, we should avoid dramatizing the whole thing. We are on the way to a (pan-Orthodox) Council, which is going to be convened according to all the rules and in due form and which will present commonly agreed on Orthodox documents to the world," Patriarch Kirill concluded.

The Holy and Great Council of Orthodox Churches took place on the island of Crete, in Greece, on June 20-26, 2016. It had been prepared, with pauses and intervals, as a pan-Orthodox Council for 55 years. However, 4 out 14 Local Orthodox Churches - the Bulgarian Church, the Church of Antioch (Syria); as well as the Georgian and the Russian Orthodox Churches - did not attend the Council’s meeting because of a disagreement with the procedure and the texts of the adopted documents.

Asked to comment on the activities of the Russian Orthodox Church in Russia, Patriarch Kirill said that over 5,000 new churches had been completed throughout Russia since he took the helm at the Russian Orthodox Church seven years ago. The number of clergymen has also risen by 10,000 under his patriarchy.

"If we take the period from 2009 to January 2016, our Church saw 5,000 new churches built and 122 newly-constructed monasteries; the number of clergymen increased by 10,000," Patriarch Kirill told journalists.

He explained that 160 new parishes had appeared in Moscow due to its expansion a few years ago. The number of parishes and bishops almost doubled from 159 to 296 and from 200 to 361, respectively.

He noted that the Russian Orthodox Church had taken the work, which it was carrying out in Russian regions, to a fundamentally new level. "The fact that today we can see the invigoration of the entire church life is certainly linked, in the first place, to the creation of new eparchies and a new vertical of power in the Russian Orthodox Church," the patriarch went on to say.

One of the most obvious advantages, which this system has, is that "today the patriarch can learn more about what happens in churches not just for statistical but also for analytical purposes - we can see what happens from year to year and how changes work in any sphere," Patriarch Kirill stressed.

"We can make adjustments to this work, what we actually do through the Supreme Church Council and the Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church. Perhaps, now we can give our first assessments to what we do. It seems to me that much has certainly changed even in statistical terms," Patriarch Kirill said.

He added that the changed attitude to Church in Russian society, was the main indicator of change inside the Russian Orthodox Church in his view.

TASS

11/22/2016

See also
Metropolitan Amfilohije of Montenegro and Litoral did not sign controversial document at Crete Metropolitan Amfilohije of Montenegro and Litoral did not sign controversial document at Crete Metropolitan Amfilohije of Montenegro and Litoral did not sign controversial document at Crete Metropolitan Amfilohije of Montenegro and Litoral did not sign controversial document at Crete
Metropolitan Amfilohije considers that the document itself was inadequately prepared, which the Serbian delegation pointed out at the preceding preparatory meetings on Crete.
Reflecting on the Message of the Holy and Great Council Reflecting on the Message of the Holy and Great Council
Fr. Ted Bobosh
Reflecting on the Message of the Holy and Great Council Reflecting on the Message of the Holy and Great Council
Fr. Ted Bobosh
The Holy and Great Council of the Orthodox Church came to an end causing little notice in the world at large. The Council’s goal seemed to be to have an assembly of bishops which changed nothing, and any event that changes nothing is not very news worthy.
Metropolitan Athanasius of Limassol: My conscience would not allow me to sign Metropolitan Athanasius of Limassol: My conscience would not allow me to sign Metropolitan Athanasius of Limassol: My conscience would not allow me to sign Metropolitan Athanasius of Limassol: My conscience would not allow me to sign
“As there arose a misunderstanding in informing believing Christians that I didn’t sign the document ‘Relations of the Orthodox Church with the Rest of the Christian World’ of the Holy and Great Council,” writes Vladyka Athanasius, “I wish to notify all those interested, that my conscience would not allow me to sign. I didn’t sign because I don’t agree with the text of the document in its finalized form.”
Questions and Answers on the Pan-Orthodox Council, Part 2 Questions and Answers on the Pan-Orthodox Council, Part 2
Fr. Peter Alban Heers
Questions and Answers on the Pan-Orthodox Council, Part 2 Questions and Answers on the Pan-Orthodox Council, Part 2
Fr. Peter Alban Heers
Protopresbyter Peter Heers, PhD., rector of the Holy Prophet Elias in Petrokerasa, Greece, and author of The Ecclesiological Renovation of Vatican II: An Orthodox Examination of Rome’s Ecumenical Theology Regarding Baptism and the Church, his doctoral dissertation completed at the University of Thessaloniki, recently spoke via video with the faithful gathered at the Apostle Paul Orthodox Christian Bookstore in Toronto, discussing various issues surrounding the present Council on the island of Crete, including the history of its preparation and the preparation of the documents under examination at the Council, as well as the disputes over the documents. Several short Q and A videos are offered below, followed by the entire presentation:
Questions and Answers on the Pan-Orthodox Council, Part 1 Questions and Answers on the Pan-Orthodox Council, Part 1
Fr. Peter Alban Heers
Questions and Answers on the Pan-Orthodox Council, Part 1 Questions and Answers on the Pan-Orthodox Council, Part 1
Fr. Peter Alban Heers
Protopresbyter Peter Heers, PhD., rector of the Holy Prophet Elias in Petrokerasa, Greece, and author of The Ecclesiological Renovation of Vatican II: An Orthodox Examination of Rome’s Ecumenical Theology Regarding Baptism and the Church, his doctoral dissertation completed at the University of Thessaloniki, recently spoke via video with the faithful gathered at the Apostle Paul Orthodox Christian Bookstore in Toronto, discussing various issues surrounding the present Council on the island of Crete, including the history of its preparation and the preparation of the documents under examination at the Council, as well as the disputes over the documents. Several short Q and A videos are offered below, followed by the entire presentation:
Open letter of the Kinot of Holy Mount Athos to the Patriarch of Constantinople Bartholomew I Open letter of the Kinot of Holy Mount Athos to the Patriarch of Constantinople Bartholomew I Open letter of the Kinot of Holy Mount Athos to the Patriarch of Constantinople Bartholomew I Open letter of the Kinot of Holy Mount Athos to the Patriarch of Constantinople Bartholomew I
The Holy Kinot (central administrative body of Mount Athos) held an emergency meeting on May 25 described as “exceptional” (because it was attended by priests and representatives of all 20 monasteries of Mount Athos), and wrote an open letter to the Patriarch of Constantinople, Bartholomew I on the eve of the Pan-Orthodox Council. The letter contains a series of critical remarks concerning the provisions of the ecumenical conciliar documents, as well as some of Patriarch Bartholomew's actions.
ROCOR HOLY SYNOD on Pan-Orthodox Council Texts ROCOR HOLY SYNOD on Pan-Orthodox Council Texts
Communication of the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia to the Clerics and Faithful—13 April 2016.
ROCOR HOLY SYNOD on Pan-Orthodox Council Texts ROCOR HOLY SYNOD on Pan-Orthodox Council Texts
Communication of the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia to the Clerics and Faithful—13 April 2016.
The process of addressing the pastoral needs of any given age is one which requires both tremendous prayer and ascetical devotion from all Christians, but also the dedicated, deliberate work to ensure, in any document the Church may put forward, the faithfulness to the Gospel we have inherited. All such texts, now as throughout history, go through many stages of preparation and revision; and the fact that we, together with others, have identified serious problems with some of the documents pending consideration by the forthcoming Council should be a cause for neither fear nor anxiety. The Holy Spirit Who always guides the Church in love, is not far from us today; and the Church is not in our times, nor has she ever been, without the active headship of her True Head, Christ our God, Whom we trust with full faith will guide His Body in all truth.
Metropolitan Gabriel of Lovech and all clergy of his diocese oppose document of the Pan-Orthodox Council Metropolitan Gabriel of Lovech and all clergy of his diocese oppose document of the Pan-Orthodox Council Metropolitan Gabriel of Lovech and all clergy of his diocese oppose document of the Pan-Orthodox Council Metropolitan Gabriel of Lovech and all clergy of his diocese oppose document of the Pan-Orthodox Council
There are no other churches besides the Holy Orthodox Church, except for heresies and schisms, and it is dogmatically, theologically and canonically totally incorrect to call these organizations “churches”.
Patriarch Kirill: We do not call the forthcoming Pan-Orthodox Council ecumenical Patriarch Kirill: We do not call the forthcoming Pan-Orthodox Council ecumenical Patriarch Kirill: We do not call the forthcoming Pan-Orthodox Council ecumenical Patriarch Kirill: We do not call the forthcoming Pan-Orthodox Council ecumenical
Ecumenical Councils and some other Councils of pan-Orthodox significance are a visible expression of the unity of the Church, her conciliar nature, a reflection of her self-awareness as one body in Christ (cf. Rom. 12:5).
Comments
Here you can leave your comment on the present article, not exceeding 4000 characters. All comments will be read by the editors of OrthoChristian.Com.
Enter through FaceBook
Your name:
Your e-mail:
Enter the digits, seen on picture:

Characters remaining: 4000

Subscribe
to our mailing list

* indicates required
×