Metropolitan Onuphry: Constantinople’s secularism and liberalism is root cause of break in communion

Kiev, November 12, 2020

Photo: frontnews.eu Photo: frontnews.eu     

The Great Schism of 1054 and the break in communion between the Churches of Russia and Constantinople today have much in common, His Beatitude Metropolitan Onuphry of Kiev and All Ukraine believes.

In a recent interview with the Pastor and Flock journal of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, His Beatitude explains that the break that occurred in 1054 was long overdue and was provoked by the administrative and political division that reflected the already-existing spiritual division between parts of the Church.

As Met. Onuphry notes, there were often disputes between the East and West over the purity of the faith, and, in fact, most of the early heretics arose in the East. And these spiritual disputes led to an administrative and political division.

Likewise, the creation and “autocephaly” of the “Orthodox Church of Ukraine” and the resulting split in communion have their backstory, the Metropolitan said.

The reason for the current division is that some representatives of Constantinople who are inclined towards free thinking and liberalism “have repeatedly tried to justify and accept laws that disagree with the Holy Gospel, which the secular world actively tries to implement in our lives today,” the Ukrainian primate notes.

“This spiritual relaxation from Constantinople in preserving the purity of the holy Orthodox faith is the root cause of the schism that occurred in 2019,” he continues.

His Beatitude also points to the desire of the Phanar to give “to Caesar not only what is Caesar’s, but also what is God’s,” which was the cause of the fall of Constantinople and the destruction of the great Byzantine Empire.

“And today, the Constantinople ecclesiastical authorities are ready to accept any custom and law forbidden by God that the world offers, just to return Constantinople (now Istanbul) to its former glory, and to regain the authority the Church had in the heyday of the Byzantine Empire,” the Ukrainian archpastor continued.

“Theoretically, the break in Eucharistic communion, which occurred in 2019, could be healed, but for that, the respected Patriarch of Constantinople should behave with all as the first in honor and equal in authority. Unfortunately, His Holiness acts as the first both in honor and authority, but this is alien to the Orthodox spirit of conciliarity, by which the Orthodox Church has lived and lives,” His Beatitude concludes.

Archpriest Nikolai Danilevich, the Deputy Head of the Ukrainian Church’s Department for External Church Relations, also recently spoke of Constantinople’s liberal theology and how it is stuck in its glorious Byzantine past.

Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Vkontakte, and Telegram!

11/12/2020

See also
Constantinople is stuck in the past, promotes liberal ecclesiology—UOC representative Constantinople is stuck in the past, promotes liberal ecclesiology—UOC representative Constantinople is stuck in the past, promotes liberal ecclesiology—UOC representative Constantinople is stuck in the past, promotes liberal ecclesiology—UOC representative
“But you can’t turn the Church into a museum of Byzantine history,” Fr. Nikolai Danilevich said.
Constantinople consecrates exarch bishop to serve on territory of Ukrainian Orthodox Church Constantinople consecrates exarch bishop to serve on territory of Ukrainian Orthodox Church Constantinople consecrates exarch bishop to serve on territory of Ukrainian Orthodox Church Constantinople consecrates exarch bishop to serve on territory of Ukrainian Orthodox Church
Archimandrite, now Bishop, Michael (Anischenko) has been serving as Patriarchal Exarch in Ukraine since January 2019. He serves in the St. Andrew’s Cathedral in Kiev that was given to Constantinople by the Poroshenko government as part of the deal to create an autocephalous church in Ukraine, on the canonical territory of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
Patriarch Bartholomew: We “temporarily tolerate” non-canonical UOC bishops in Ukraine Patriarch Bartholomew: We “temporarily tolerate” non-canonical UOC bishops in Ukraine Patriarch Bartholomew: We “temporarily tolerate” non-canonical UOC bishops in Ukraine Patriarch Bartholomew: We “temporarily tolerate” non-canonical UOC bishops in Ukraine
In response to an inquiry from the editors of the Ukrainian outlet Cerkvarium Patriarch Bartholomew clarifies that he only “temporarily tolerates” the ministry of the bishops of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, who suddenly found themselves mere titular or residing hierarchs by the will of the Patriarchate of Constantinople ever since the creation of the “Orthodox Church of Ukraine.”
Metropolitan Vladimir of Kiev, 2008: Creating Parallel Jurisdictions Will Not Heal the Schism Metropolitan Vladimir of Kiev, 2008: Creating Parallel Jurisdictions Will Not Heal the Schism Metropolitan Vladimir of Kiev, 2008: Creating Parallel Jurisdictions Will Not Heal the Schism Metropolitan Vladimir of Kiev, 2008: Creating Parallel Jurisdictions Will Not Heal the Schism
Metropolitan Vladimir (Sabodan)
As we see from events in Ukraine since Patriarch Bartholomew created the “Orthodox Church in Ukraine” in 2018, against the plea here expressed by Metropolitan Vladimir and the fullness of the UOC, Metropolitan Vladimir was completely correct in his foresight.
Constantinple was ready to interfere in Ukrainian Church issue in 2008, newly-published document reveals Constantinple was ready to interfere in Ukrainian Church issue in 2008, newly-published document reveals Constantinple was ready to interfere in Ukrainian Church issue in 2008, newly-published document reveals Constantinple was ready to interfere in Ukrainian Church issue in 2008, newly-published document reveals
Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople was ready to “settle the Ukrainian Church problem” back in 2008, and the schismatic “Kiev Patriarchate” (KP) was ready to become an autonomous Church within the Patriarchate of Constantinople, according to an appeal from the hierarchs of the KP to the Patriarch at that time.
Constantinople’s fallacious ecclesiology is obvious to Orthodox world, Ukrainian hierarch believes Constantinople’s fallacious ecclesiology is obvious to Orthodox world, Ukrainian hierarch believes Constantinople’s fallacious ecclesiology is obvious to Orthodox world, Ukrainian hierarch believes Constantinople’s fallacious ecclesiology is obvious to Orthodox world, Ukrainian hierarch believes
Commenting on the Synod’s recent statement on Constantinople and the urgent need to resolve the Ukrainian Church crisis arising from Constantinople’s un-Orthodox ecclesiology, Abp. Theodosy noted that, unlike the Catholic church, “the ecclesiology of Orthodoxy is the ecclesiology of conciliarity, of the conciliar governance of the Church.”
Comments
Here you can leave your comment on the present article, not exceeding 4000 characters. All comments will be read by the editors of OrthoChristian.Com.
Enter through FaceBook
Your name:
Your e-mail:
Enter the digits, seen on picture:

Characters remaining: 4000

Subscribe
to our mailing list

* indicates required
×