Phanar's actions and postmodernity: it all fits

Source: Union of Orthodox Journalists

November 18, 2020

    

Reading another absurd statement by the Phanar, we are amazed – how can one say dark is bright so openly, and vice versa? But there is a theory that explains everything.

Today you can hear the phrase that modernity is already the day before yesterday, and, accordingly, postmodernity is yesterday. The question “What is the name for today?” remains open, but that's not the point. The Phanar's actions today fully fit into the philosophy of this post-postmodernity and are explained by it. Let's look into the matter...

... Read the rest at Union of Orthodox Journalists.

11/18/2020

See also
Metropolitan Onuphry: Constantinople’s secularism and liberalism is root cause of break in communion Metropolitan Onuphry: Constantinople’s secularism and liberalism is root cause of break in communion Metropolitan Onuphry: Constantinople’s secularism and liberalism is root cause of break in communion Metropolitan Onuphry: Constantinople’s secularism and liberalism is root cause of break in communion
The reason for the current division is that some representatives of Constantinople who are inclined towards free thinking and liberalism “have repeatedly tried to justify and accept laws that disagree with the Holy Gospel, which the secular world actively tries to implement in our lives today,” the Ukrainian primate notes.
The “Tomosology” of the Patriarchate of Constantinople. Part 3 The “Tomosology” of the Patriarchate of Constantinople. Part 3
Pavel Darovsky
The “Tomosology” of the Patriarchate of Constantinople. Part 3 The “Tomosology” of the Patriarchate of Constantinople. Part 3
Pavel Darovsky
The “Patriarchal Ecumenical Throne” of Constantinople is declared as the head of the Church, and not the Lord Jesus Christ, who is merely called the “Founder” of the Church. This carries already not only canonical, but also critical dogmatic significance.
The “Tomosology” of the Patriarchate of Constantinople. Part 2 The “Tomosology” of the Patriarchate of Constantinople. Part 2
Pavel Darovsky
The “Tomosology” of the Patriarchate of Constantinople. Part 2 The “Tomosology” of the Patriarchate of Constantinople. Part 2
Pavel Darovsky
This document, in actuality, begins a new era of “nominal autocephaly,” in which the number and qualities of the rights of supposedly independent autocephalic Churches are greater than those of autonomous Churches.
The “Tomosology” of the Patriarchate of Constantinople Part 1 The “Tomosology” of the Patriarchate of Constantinople Part 1
Pavel Darovsky
The “Tomosology” of the Patriarchate of Constantinople Part 1 The “Tomosology” of the Patriarchate of Constantinople Part 1
Pavel Darovsky
We can trace the genesis of the formation of new doctrines on the Church, which at first filled “gaps” in canon law, then began to supplant it and ultimately came into conflict with it.
Constantinople’s fallacious ecclesiology is obvious to Orthodox world, Ukrainian hierarch believes Constantinople’s fallacious ecclesiology is obvious to Orthodox world, Ukrainian hierarch believes Constantinople’s fallacious ecclesiology is obvious to Orthodox world, Ukrainian hierarch believes Constantinople’s fallacious ecclesiology is obvious to Orthodox world, Ukrainian hierarch believes
Commenting on the Synod’s recent statement on Constantinople and the urgent need to resolve the Ukrainian Church crisis arising from Constantinople’s un-Orthodox ecclesiology, Abp. Theodosy noted that, unlike the Catholic church, “the ecclesiology of Orthodoxy is the ecclesiology of conciliarity, of the conciliar governance of the Church.”
Should a Man Who is in Captivity to Turks and the USA Determine the Course of the Church? Should a Man Who is in Captivity to Turks and the USA Determine the Course of the Church?
Panayiotis Katramados
Should a Man Who is in Captivity to Turks and the USA Determine the Course of the Church? Should a Man Who is in Captivity to Turks and the USA Determine the Course of the Church?
Panayiotis Katramados
We see that Orthodoxy has come to an impasse: whosoever controls one person—the Patriarch of the Phanar—will be able to lead the entire Church through him.

Subscribe
to our mailing list

* indicates required
×