Two Russian bishops banned from serving by Supreme Ecclesiastical Court

Moscow, March 5, 2021

Bp. Ignaty (Buzin) (left) and Bp. Ignaty (Tarasov) (righ). Photo: raskolam.net Bp. Ignaty (Buzin) (left) and Bp. Ignaty (Tarasov) (righ). Photo: raskolam.net     

Two hierarchs of the Russian Orthodox Church have been banned from celebrating the Divine services by the Supreme Ecclesiastical Court for “ecclesiastical offenses incompatible with the administration of dioceses.”

The cases of His Grace Bishop Ignaty (Tarasov), formerly of the Diocese of Kostomushka, and His Grace Bishop Ignaty (Buzin), formerly of the Diocese of Armavir, were heard by the Court at Moscow’s Novospassky Monastery on Tuesday and Wednesday. Their cases were referred to the Court by His Holiness Patriarch Kirill in May after the Patriarchate received documented allegations against them, reports the site of the Russian Orthodox Church.

Having thoroughly examined the materials received and the testimonies of the clergy and laity interviewed during the investigation of the charges, and the explanations of both the hierarchs, the Court found them both guilty of committing ecclesiastical offenses and determined their punishment as being banned from celebrating the services.

The Court’s decisions will be sent for consideration by Pat. Kirill and will enter into force upon his approval.

In particular, having heard the case of Bp. Ignaty (Tarasov) on Tuesday, the Court found him guilty of conduct falling under Apostolic Canons 25 and 42, “which led to a significant disruption of diocesan life in the Diocese of Kostomuksha, previously entrusted to his administration.”

Apostolic Canon 25 reads: “If a bishop, presbyter, or deacon be found guilty of fornication, perjury, or theft, let him be deposed, but let him not be excommunicated; for the Scripture says, you shall not punish a man twice for the same offense. In like manner the other clergy shall be subject to the same proceeding.”

Canon 42 reads: “If a bishop or presbyter, or deacon, is addicted to dice or drinking, let him either give it over, or be deposed.”

In addition to his suspension, the Court also revoked his right to wear the episcopal Panagia and clothing. The question of his canonical status can be reconsidered once he has shown active repentance. The Court has asked the Patriarch to determine a monastery where Bp. Ignaty can live and offer his repentance.

Having heard the case of Bp. Ignaty (Buzin) on Wednesday, the Court also found him guilty of offenses falling under Apostolic Canon 25, noting that his actions “entailed significant disturbances in the diocesan life and caused deep spiritual harm to a part of the Church flock entrusted to him.”

Bp. Ignaty is also prohibited from wearing the episcopal Panagia and clothing, and Pat. Kirill will also determine his place of repentance.

The Court’s decisions can be appealed at the next session of the Bishops’ Council of the Russian Church, currently scheduled to be held in November.

Another bishop, Flavian of Cherepovets, was defrocked by the Holy Synod in December, also on the basis of Apostolic Canons 25 and 42. After being released from diocesan administration in August, he was to reside at St. Paul of Obnora Monastery in the Vologda Diocese. Instead, he fled to London.

Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Vkontakte, Telegram, WhatsApp, Parler, MeWe, and Gab!

3/5/2021

Comments
Marko Markovich 3/8/2021 7:02 pm
What the Russian Orthodox Church should do is to inform the Russian Orthodox Churches in London and ROCOR as well as other canonical Orthodox churches about deposed and defrocked bishops who are in the UK and Europe.
Editor3/7/2021 9:06 pm
JJ: We are covering the ecclesiastical side of this, which is that Flavian was defrocked. That is not something an ecclesiastical court does lightly. As for the RFE article, we can only comment that as journalism, it is full of holes. There are things that don't make sense or hold water. For example, it says that all Russian Orthodox priests have to be married, as if trying to excuse Flavian for his divorce. That's not true--there is is the monastic clergy, which is not married. Flavian talks as if he were somehow coerced into becoming a bishop. No one in the Church would ever coerce someone into an epicsopacy. So who was urging him on to become a Russian bishop and give up his cozy life in London? His divorce would have been his own decision. Then, his official salary as a bishop was "1.5 million rubles ($20,500) a month." That is an eye-popper. Bishops in Russia do not have official salaries like that. I doubt they even have official salaries at all. Where then did he get all that money? That is a very large salary for an ordinary Russian citizen. And his answer about physical relations with Kain (which in English would be Cain) that "Your question is absurd. Monks do not have sexual relations." To be exact, monks are not supposed to have sexual relations, but that is not a yes or no answer from Flavian. It's also quite disingenuous of him to imply that all the bishops agree to give information to the FSB. Information about what? What would an ordinary bishop have in the way of information that would be interesting to the FSB? He's obviously leaving something out here. My take on this is that he was dishonest in Russia, and he's just as dishonest in London.
Jesse Dominick 3/6/2021 2:44 pm
JJ, as for me, I have no idea how much of that story is true. I would imagine there is some truth with a good deal of exaggeration and distortion by a man holding a grudge.
JJ3/6/2021 12:28 am
News mentioned in the last paragraph namely".... Another bishop, Flavian of Cherepovets, was defrocked by the Holy Synod in December, also on the basis of Apostolic Canons 25 and 42. After being released from diocesan administration in August, he was to reside at St. Paul of Obnora Monastery in the Vologda Diocese. Instead, he fled to London...." was featured in an item by Radio Free Europe. Is the content in RFE's story really true? https://www.rferl.org/a/whats-behind-fsb-case-against-a-russian-orthodox-bishop/31004285.html
Here you can leave your comment on the present article, not exceeding 4000 characters. All comments will be read by the editors of OrthoChristian.Com.
Enter through FaceBook
Your name:
Your e-mail:
Enter the digits, seen on picture:

Characters remaining: 4000

Subscribe
to our mailing list

* indicates required
×