Nominee for The First Nobel Peace Prize

Viktor Nemerovsky on Tsar Nicholas II as a Peacemaker Ahead of His Time

On October 20 (November 2, according to the new style), 1894, Emperor Alexander III, the Peacemaker, reposed in Livadia. The next day, October 21 (November 3), Emperor Nicholas II ascended the All-Russian throne, and Empress Alexandra Feodorovna was joined to the Orthodox Church. On November 14 (27) of that same year, their wedding and coronation took place. Every week, the residents of Pskov, who have great reverence for the family of the last Russian Emperor, canonized as saints in 2000, pray to them in the Tsar’s chapel. In the Akathist to Tsar Nicholas II are words: “Rejoice, O peacemaker in your life.” Unfortunately, not many know about Nicholas II as a peacemaker. This highly relevant topic is addressed in the book, The Peacekeeping Activities of Emperor Nicholas II (1894–1917) by Viktor Nemerovsky, a candidate of pedagogical sciences, associate professor at Pskov State University; author of sixteen textbooks, eight monographs on education, history, and sports, five on health and educational technologies; he is also a recipient of the “Veteran” distinction from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation.

Portrait of Emperor Nicholas II. 1896. Artist: Ilya Repin Portrait of Emperor Nicholas II. 1896. Artist: Ilya Repin Viktor Mikhailovich, in his sermon on July 4/17, St. John of Shanghai, Wonderworker of Western Europe and San Francisco, said that Tsar Nicholas II embodied the best traits of the Tsars of the House of Romanov; that the crime against him was all the more terrible and sinful because his entire family—including innocent children—was killed along with him, and that such crimes do not go unpunished. They cry out to Heaven and bring down God’s wrath on earth.

—St. John (Maximovich) named the reason for what is happening to us now. It’s a pity that not everyone realizes that it is precisely for the murder of the defenseless Tsar-Martyr and his family that the entire Russian people, who allowed this terrible crime and remained silent when the Tsar was humiliated and deprived of freedom, now suffer. Bishop John said that Russia must bow before the humiliated, slandered, and martyred Tsar, that God’s Truth demands from us a deep understanding of the sinfulness of what was done and repentance before the memory of the Tsar, that this terrible crime committed against Tsar-Martyr Nicholas II and his much-suffering family should be atoned for by fervent veneration of him and glorification of his feat.

Born on the day of the memory of righteous Job the Much-Suffering, the most pious and much-suffering Tsar Nicholas showed patience in times of severe trials, similar to Job’s patience. Long before the glorification of Nicholas II and his family, Archbisho[ John called on everyone to pray to them, as did the great Elder Nikolai Guryanov, who called the Russian people’s veneration of the Royal Martyrs, “Russia’s spiritual shield.” And today, when some of our contemporaries continue to ask the question: “So who is Nicholas II—St. Nicholas, or Bloody Nicholas?” we should not doubt his sanctity. The last Russian Emperor forgave his murderers and asked not to take revenge for him and his family, but to remember that, although evil in the world will multiply, it is not evil that will prevail, but only love. The Gospel says: By their fruits you shall know them (Matt. 7:20). And the Beatitudes remind us: Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God (Matt. 5:9). Unfortunately, not many know about Nicholas II as a peacemaker.

Viktor Mikhailovich, your book contains many unknown facts, as well as prophecies about the fate of Russia and the role of its last Emperor. You also quote St. John of Shanghai.

—According to Bishop John, Nicholas II was most similar to Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich the “Most Peaceful”, but undoubtedly surpassed him in meekness. Nicholas II’s reforms were implemented more wisely and without the abruptness characteristic of Peter the Great. Russia admires Alexander I the Blessed, who liberated Europe from Napoleon. But under more difficult conditions, Emperor Nicholas Alexandrovich stood up against the tyranny of the Triple Alliance, and it is not his fault that Russia did not reach a victorious end. Following after Alexander II the Liberator, Tsar Nicholas II liberated even more people, not only Slavic but more than ten other nationalities. Following in the footsteps of his father, Alexander III the Peacemaker, Tsar Nicholas II initiated and implemented the most humane Peace project, which will remain relevant as long as humanity lives. His entire life was a service to God and the people. S. Yu. Witte, P. A. Stolypin, V. N. Kokovtsov, and other prominent statesmen of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries testified that Nicholas II simultaneously initiated, supervised, and financed more than 30 international-level peacekeeping projects. He not only initiated but also brought to life such century-defining projects as the Trans-Siberian Railway, the UN, and the construction of the subway [in major Russian cities]. Now enjoying their fruits, we do not even think about whom we should thank for them. And we should thank Nicholas II, who for twenty-two years was engaged in Russia’s internal and foreign policy projects, eighteen years in educational and healthcare reforms, seventeen years in Peace Conferences, and sixteen years in military reform. The successes of Emperor Nicholas II’s reign cannot fail to impress even skeptics.

Both Witte’s successful monetary reform and Stolypin’s agrarian reform (the emancipation of peasants from being bound to gentry-owned land) authors proposed naming the “Nikolaevsky” reforms, because it was Nicholas II who initiated and supervised them. All his reforms aimed at a peaceful and prosperous life for Russia’s subjects and allies. Under his reign, there was a clear improvement in the well-being of the people. Free medical care for the poor had been in place since 1898. In 1906, the best labor legislation in Europe and free compulsory primary education were established. And after all he did for the prosperity of Russia, the Tsar and his family were murdered by criminals.

Everything you listed completely refutes the century-old myths of “bloodthirstiness,” “weak-will,” and “incompetence” of the last Emperor of Russia. The trials he and his family endured purified those innocent sufferers like gold in the furnace. But the myths about Nicholas II and his family, canonized as saints, continue to live even today.

—These myths are devastatingly debunked by a series of documentaries with characteristic titles by the well-known historian Alexander Bokhanov (“Ahead of His Time”), Pyotr Multatuli (“Thwarted Triumph”), and television journalist Elena Kozenkova (“Economic Miracle”). Elena Kozenkova wrote in an article about Alexander Bokhanov, whom the Tsar himself brought to God, about the need for a historical restoration of the slandered image of Tsar Nicholas, how the intensified slander from the Soviet period must be diligently and patiently exposed.

Thoughtful journalists, writers, and analytical economists like I.L. Solonevich and V.M. Lavrov, following historians of Nicholas II’s reign (N.N. Obruchev, S.S. Oldenburg, N.D. Talberg, and others), rightly believe that this period was characterized by an unprecedented flourishing of science, industry, and agriculture. This period (especially 1907–1914) can be called an economic miracle, bringing Russia as close as possible to autarchy.

What is autarchy?

—This word (from the Greek αὐτός “self” and κράτος “power”) means a system of closed reproduction of a community with minimal dependence on exchange with the external environment. In other words, it is an economic regime of self-sufficiency, complete economic independence, and a state’s self-reliance or the maximal striving for them.

Now, sanctions are pushing Russia towards autarchy. But do we have any chances of seeing its fruits?

—Only God knows. If not for the betrayal of Emperor Nicholas II, whose reign lasted twenty-two years, four months, and three days, he could very well have seen the fruits of autarchy with his own eyes, as he strived all his life to fulfill the covenants of his father, Emperor Alexander III: to seek peace with all states in foreign policy and to strive for the peaceful prosperity of the peoples of Russia in domestic policy.

Unfortunately, during Nicholas II’s reign, the rampage of global evil in both domestic and foreign policy reached its peak. Convincing the entire civilized world that the Russian superpower would do everything to ensure that there were no wars on Earth, and understanding that at any moment the superpowers could unite into a single military bloc against Russia, the Tsar initiated and participated in two International Peace Conferences on disarmament in The Hague, in 1899 and 1907. For more than a hundred years, a huge portrait of Nicholas II, the first nominee for the Nobel Peace Prize, hangs in the grand hall of the Peace Palace in The Hague. He became this nominee in 1901. He is the only statesman of modern times who proclaimed Christian commandments as the basis of life both in Russia and worldwide.

Not finding an opportunity to reconcile with the Triple Alliance, he concluded a military agreement with France and England (the Entente) to prevent a world war. When anti-monarchist sentiments were brewing in Russian domestic politics, the Tsar found a compromise for reconciliation with the opposition. The culmination was the Manifesto of October 17, 1905, proclaiming political and civil liberties. But the intensity of terrorism in Russia did not diminish. Despite the state of emergency introduced by P.A. Stolypin in 1906, which temporarily halted the revolutionary frenzy, revolutionaries killed about 12,000 representatives of the tsarist government from 1901 to 1907, leaving the Tsar with few to rely on.

—The most astonishing thing is that neither the political banditry of 1901–1907, the peak of the 1905–1907 revolution, the onset of the world war, nor more than ten assassination attempts on the Tsar and his family could force him to change his peacekeeping course in the country’s domestic and foreign policy! When slandered, betrayed by everyone, and unlawfully dethroned, the Anointed of God and his Royal family received invitations to leave for England, Germany, or Scandinavia, they responded that they wished to share the fate with their people. The entire life of the Tsar’s family was pious and aimed at active peacekeeping.

In my book, I present far from a complete list of the most effective projects and reforms realized during the reign of the last Russian Emperor. I provide a chronology of peacekeeping projects aimed at saving states and their peoples from colonization or physical extermination and the years of their implementation. This includes the rescue of China, Korea, Japan, Tibet, France, Italy, Siam (Thailand), the Balkan countries, and Turkish Armenia. This also includes the autonomy of Mongolia, the rescue of Turkey from partition, and much more.

It is known that the Tsar had projects for the future development of Russia, which he did not manage to realize due to the onset of World War I and his subsequent forced removal from power.

—The copyright for the tsarist projects was later appropriated by Lenin and Stalin. Nicholas II did not manage to realize the Third International Peace Conference, the electrification of Russia (GOELRO), the construction of hydroelectric power plants, the Baikal-Amur Mainline (BAM), the White Sea Canal, and the metropolitan subway system. He did not have time to introduce universal secondary education, although he planned to work on these projects.

Using the longest railway in the world today—the Trans-Siberian Railway—do we thank the last Emperor of Russia for it? No. Yet, he dedicated more than 25 years of his life to his brainchild, starting work on this project while still Tsesarevich. We discussed this at a roundtable in Pskov within the framework of the traveling photo exhibition “The Eastern Journey of Tsesarevich Nicholas Alexandrovich. 1890–1891,” brought to Pskov by its organizers and participants of the automobile pilgrimage, “Holy Russia.”

Tsesarevich carries the first wheelbarrow onto the roadbed Tsesarevich carries the first wheelbarrow onto the roadbed     

During his nine-month Eastern journey, Nicholas Alexandrovich personally led the laying of the Ussuri section of the Great Siberian Railway in Vladivostok. But who knows about this?

—On April 17, 1891, Emperor Alexander III instructed the heir to the throne, upon returning to Russian soil after his journey to the East, to announce the start of construction at the state’s expense of a continuous railway through the Asian part of Russia, to connect the abundant gifts of Siberian nature with the internal rail network. Fulfilling his father’s will, the Tsesarevich headed the Siberian Railway Committee, which connected Siberia with other parts of the Empire, demonstrating the Tsar’s keen care for its peaceful prosperity. On May 19, 1891, after a prayer service, Nicholas Alexandrovich, like a simple worker, took a shovel, filled a wheelbarrow with earth, and carried it onto the roadbed of the future railway.

The Tsesarevich also personally laid the foundation stone for the railway station building at the “Vladivostok” station. Taking a hammer and trowel, he devoutly made the sign of the cross and cemented the commemorative plaque in the cornerstone.

The Trans-Siberian Railway, built under Nicholas II, holds colossal significance even today. Without it, there would be no “Russian economic miracle.” Through the Trans-Siberian Railway, the Emperor began brilliantly implementing the Great Asian Program, to which he devoted 15 years of his life. If Peter I “opened a window to Europe,” then Nicholas II “opened a window to Asia.”

The entire life of Emperor Nicholas II and his family was dedicated to serving God and the people. Their sacrificial service to Russia was a life lived according to the Gospel commandments. They not figuratively but literally laid down their lives for their friends. We must honor the great feat of this holy family and pray to them every day.

Interview with Viktor Nemerovsky
Conducted by Irina Akhundova
Translation by OrthoChristian.com

Pravoslavie.ru

7/17/2024

Comments
Natasha7/19/2024 4:20 pm
Panagiotis. (if my comments get published) 1) There were no Ukrainians in the sense of nationality before 1917. Ukraine, like Belarus, was created by Lenin. Here cycyron writes on the website https://cycyron.livejournal.com/1622283.html: "I. Franko wrote in his diary: “Today I was insulted (insulted - Polish) and called a Ukrainian, although everyone knows that I am a Rusin.” For information, before the Revolution, only those who renounced the Orthodox faith and converted to Greek Catholicism (Uniateism) called themselves Ukrainians. The word “Ukrainian” did not mean nationality, but belonging to this heresy." In the 1920-30s, Ukrainization and Belarusization were carried out in the territories of the Ukrainian SSR and BSSR. That is, the artificial introduction and strengthening of everything “Ukrainian” and “Belarusian”. From the site https://topwar.ru/175407-zagadka-proishozhdenija-ukraincev.html: "Interestingly, until the revolution of 1917, the overwhelming majority of the population of Ukraine-Little Russia (part of the Russian world) considered themselves Russian. “Ukrainians” at that time were isolated representatives of the Little Russian intelligentsia who became victims of Polish and Austrian propaganda. That is, the “Ukrainians,” both during the times of Bohdan Khmelnitsky and Mazepa, and during the times of the leader of the Directory Vladimir Vinnychenko in 1918 or under the President of Ukraine Vladimir Zelensky in 2020, are ultimately the same Russians. Only the degree of “programming” is different. If at the beginning of the 20th century almost all residents of present-day Ukraine considered themselves Russians and Rusins, then at the beginning of the 21st century only a part did. Moreover, they are all descendants of Russians, they speak and think in Russian, they live on Russian soil and in Russian cities."
Panagiotis7/18/2024 5:44 am
The purveyors of the malicious lies and slander against Holy Tzar Martyr Nicholas II were the sinister internationalist Masters of Lies and Propaganda. They disseminated those lies in order to brainwash weak people, so they could take over Holy Orthodox Russia, destroy the Orthodox Church, and eradicate the Orthodox, as they had great hatred for Russians, Ukrainians, and all Orthodox. This was their real goal, and also of course the gangsters wanted to plunder the wealth of Russia. The lies persist to this day in many sectors because the devious wealthy internationalists control the news media, academia, the entertainment industry, etc and they do not want the truth to come out. They don't want the truth to come out about who brought monster communism to Russia and who FUNDED the so-called "Russian" Revolution, I.E. the communist revolution. They don't want the truth to come out about the TENS OF MILLIONS of Orthodox Christians who were savagely murdered in the most inhumane and brutal methods imaginable. Satanic methods. Alexander Solzhenitsyn was correct my friends. Now we see in the modern era the same Masters of Lies and Propaganda who are spewing forth a never-ending stream of anti-Russian propaganda. They still hate the Orthodox and they want to destroy the Conservative Orthodox Church. THEY HATE ALL ORTHODOX. Do not be brainwashed by these deceitful internationalists. WAKE UP. REJECT COMMUNISM AND REJECT NO GOOD LIBERALISM. Embrace conservative Orthodoxy and EMBRACE ORTHODOX UNITY. Return to our conservative Orthodox roots, including the restoration of ALL of our Holy Orthodox Monarchies, and this will be the greatest way to honor the memory of Holy Tzar Martyr Nicholas II. +++ May His Memory Be Eternal +++ All glory to our True God Jesus Christ. Just my humble opinion.
Dionysius Redington7/17/2024 8:21 pm
The Czar-Martyr is an especially important saint for our times, when so many people (including Orthodox people) consider Orthodoxy to be somehow synonymous with the blanket rejection of all things Western. St Nicholas transcended the Westerniser/Slavophile divide, embracing science, technology, and many (though obviously not all) aspects of modernity. His private life was essentially that of a 19th century English gentleman, showing that it is possible to live a 'normal' life (to the extent that an Emperor's life can ever be normal) and still be a saint. Holy New Royal Martyrs, pray to God for us and for the peace of the world! -- Dionysius Redington
Editor7/17/2024 5:50 pm
Fr. Patrick, so far, it is only available in Russian.
V. Rev. Fr Patrick B O'Grady, Ph.D.7/17/2024 4:59 pm
Wonderful article! How do we find Nemerovsky’s book in English? Or does it exist as yet only in Russian?
Here you can leave your comment on the present article, not exceeding 4000 characters. All comments will be read by the editors of OrthoChristian.Com.
Enter through FaceBook
Your name:
Your e-mail:
Enter the digits, seen on picture:

Characters remaining: 4000

Subscribe
to our mailing list

* indicates required
×