Ecumenical Patriarch sends legates to Kiev, begins process of autocephaly

Moscow, September 7, 2018

    

The website of the Ecumenical Patriarch Permanent Delegation to the World Council of Churches has announced that the Ecumenical Patriarchate has sent legates to the Ukraine:

“The Chief Secretariat of the Holy and Sacred Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate announced on 7 September 2018 that within the framework of the preparations for the granting of autocephaly to the Orthodox Church in Ukraine, the Ecumenical Patriarchate has appointed as its Exarchs in Kiev His Excellency Archbishop Daniel of Pamphilon from the United States, and His Grace Bishop Ilarion of Edmonton from Canada, both of whom are serving the Ukrainian Orthodox faithful in their respective countries under the Ecumenical Patriarchate.”

It is still unclear just how the Ecumenical Patriarchate intends to structure an autocephalous Church in Ukraine, given that the canonical, autonomous Church, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church under the Moscow Patriarchate, has not requested autocephaly, and is in no way party to this decision.

The President of the Ukaine, Petro Poroshenko, has requested the Ecumenical Patriarchate to grant autocephaly to a combination of schismatic groups that currently exist in the Ukraine. Far-right Ukrainian nationalists have already in the recent past felt empowered to seize churches belonging to the canonical Church, in an expression of anti-Russian aggression.

As OrthoChristian.com has reported repeatedly, twelve Local Orthodox Churches have formally expressed their disagreement with the EP’s intentions.

Other English language media such as the Greek Reporter and Ekathimerini have posted news on this announcement, but with factual mistakes. For example, the Greek Reporter states:

“The Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, that is considered as First among Equals in the Orthodox Christianity, announced that it will start the procedure for the official recognition of the Church of Ukraine as Autocephalous.

“The Ukrainian Church belongs to the Patriarchate of Moscow and has asked for a separation via the recognition of its Ecclesiastical independence by being granted the status of Autocephaly.”

The glaring mistake lies in the fact that the Ukrainian Church that belongs to the Moscow Patriarchate has not asked for independence (because it is already independent) or autocephaly, and especially not from the Ecumenical Patriarchate.

Ekathimerini makes the same mistake, and adds also that the EP is the sole authority that can grant autocephaly—a point that is disputed by other Local Churches.

Concerning the Moscow Patriarchate’s comment on this almost unbelievable action, the Russian website Interfax-Religion has quoted Vladimir Legoida, head of the Synodal Department for Church, Society and Media Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate, who posted on his social network page this evening:

“The appointment by the Patriarch of Constantinople of his episcopal representatives in Ukraine, without agreement with the Patriarch of Moscow and All Russia and His Beatitude Metropolitan of Kiev and All Ukraine, is nothing but an unprecedentedly gross incursion into the Moscow Patriarchate's canonical territory. These actions cannot be left unanswered.”

Interfax has also reported an official statement on this action from the Department for External Church Relations of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church:

“The Ukrainian Orthodox Church sees the appointment of two Constantinople exarchs in Kiev as a massive violation of its canonical territory and said responsibility for any possible negative consequences of that will rest with the Constantinople Patriarchate.

"The Department for External Church Relations of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church is authorized to say with the blessing of his Beatitude Metropolitan Onufry of Kiev and All Ukraine that the appointment of exarchs is a massive violation of the canonical territory of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church," the DECR of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church said in a statement released on Friday evening.

“The document said this decision made by Constantinople contradicts the second rule of the Second Ecumenical (Constantinople) Assembly, which states that bishops cannot cross the limits of their regions without being invited.

“According to the statement, the appointment of exarchs in Kiev took place without the knowledge of Metropolitan Onufry of Kiev and All Ukraine "as the sole canonical bishop of the city of Kiev."

“In this regard, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church said that ‘responsibility for any possible negative consequences of that action rests with the Constantinople Patriarchate’.”

9/8/2018

See also
A Canon Aimed at Moscow? A Canon Aimed at Moscow?
Nun Cornelia (Rees)
A Canon Aimed at Moscow? A Canon Aimed at Moscow?
Nun Cornelia (Rees)
Will Constantinople go ahead and fulfil President Petro Poroshenko’s request that an autocephalous Church be granted in the Ukraine, making that country separate from Russia not only in body but also in soul?
Repentance and not Autocephaly is needed to heal the schism in Ukraine: An interview with the Archbishop Theodosy (Snigiryov) of Boyarka Repentance and not Autocephaly is needed to heal the schism in Ukraine: An interview with the Archbishop Theodosy (Snigiryov) of Boyarka Repentance and not Autocephaly is needed to heal the schism in Ukraine: An interview with the Archbishop Theodosy (Snigiryov) of Boyarka Repentance and not Autocephaly is needed to heal the schism in Ukraine
An interview with the Archbishop Theodosy (Snigiryov) of Boyarka
Sergei Geruk, Archbishop Theodosy (Snigiryov) of Boyarka
The 1030th anniversary celebration of the Baptism of Rus’ revealed new tendencies in the church life of Ukraine, made manifest in the hidden attitudes of society towards the church. What were the spiritual results of this anniversary? Has the danger of the non-canonical legalization of the schism ceased? What is the spiritual status of the Ukrainian flock? When will peace finally come to Ukraine?
Address of the Holy Synod of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church to the Faithful on the Possibility of Granting a Tomos of Autocephaly to the Orthodox Church in Ukraine Address of the Holy Synod of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church to the Faithful on the Possibility of Granting a Tomos of Autocephaly to the Orthodox Church in Ukraine Address of the Holy Synod of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church to the Faithful on the Possibility of Granting a Tomos of Autocephaly to the Orthodox Church in Ukraine Address of the Holy Synod of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church to the Faithful on the Possibility of Granting a Tomos of Autocephaly to the Orthodox Church in Ukraine
At its session on May 25 at the Holy Dormition-Kiev Caves Lavra, the Holy Synod of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church adopted an address to the bishops, clergy, monastics, and laity regarding the initiative for “providing a tomos of autocephaly to the Orthodox Church in Ukraine.”
Anti-Orthodox project is realized in Ukraine - political scientist Anti-Orthodox project is realized in Ukraine - political scientist Anti-Orthodox project is realized in Ukraine - political scientist Anti-Orthodox project is realized in Ukraine - political scientist
"Ukrainism from the very start was an anti-Orthodox concept: it was directed not only against Russians, against Moskals, it was directed against Orthodoxy. This concept was formed in the West, in Austria-Hungary, in Poland, in Catholic countries and it is realized today."
Comments
Anthony9/9/2018 10:52 pm
@ Beloved Мomčilo. Greetings of the day! Mount Athos is silent because it has been stuffed with Bart's cronies. Those who opposed him have been forced to leave. I also agree with you that Mt Athos was very harsh in its reference to Skopians. They could have referred to them as Bulgarians and Albanians which they are.
Мomčilo9/9/2018 6:39 am
Where is the reaction from the Holy Mount Athos? Have they nothing to say on this? Yet they voiced their opinion on the name of Macedonia? Which is what that geographic region was know since the dawn of time? And they called all the citizens by the derogatory name of "skopjans". And this move by their Patriarch is not worth a strong condemnation? I am really dissapointed and angry. If Mount Athos stays silent now...then..the end must be near.
John 9/9/2018 4:34 am
Of course you all are right about the dates! Please forgive me all, especially St. John! The piece was reprinted in 'The Orthodox Word' in 1972.

Sorry for the confusion!



Rdr Andreas Moran9/8/2018 8:16 pm
Readers will realise that St John of San Francisco, having reposed in the Lord in 1966, did not say what he is quoted here as saying in 1972. It was in 1938 according to what I have read.
R-monk Antonii9/8/2018 6:26 pm
John, you are mistaken on the dates. St John reposed in '66 so he obviously didn't write that in '72. He wrote it back in 1938-

http://orthodoxinfo.com/ecumenism/decline.aspx

You are absolutely right in content how St John seems rather prophetic in his talk on the EP.... Lord, have mercy.
John9/8/2018 4:00 pm
St. John of Shanghai and SF in 1972:

"The next logical step for the Ecumenical Patriarchate would be to declare the whole of Russia as being under the the jurisdiction of Constantinople."

"The moral authority of the Patriarchs of Constantinople has likewise fallen very low in view of their extreme instability in ecclesiastical matters. Thus, Patriarch Meletius IV arranged a 'Pan-Orthodox Congress,' with representatives of various churches, which decreed the introduction of the New Calendar. This decree, recognized only by a part of the Church, introduced a frightful schism among Orthodox Christians."
Steve Cox9/8/2018 2:36 pm
Actually, a split of sorts has existed for some time now. For a long time Russia has been considered the third Rome. This just solidified it. As the church in Ukraine sends Bartholomew money maybe he can further preach about saving the planet from pollution. May God remove the human pollution that has infiltrated our Church.
Castrese Tipaldi9/8/2018 10:49 am
The only good thing of this shameless decision is that now the enemies of Christ inside the Church should have to declare themselves openly, and anathemize themselves.

May this adulterous generation in the Ukraine remember that nobody and nothing, not even the blood of martyrdom, can heal a schism, but repentance and renouncing the errors. The habit is necessary for all things, and sufficient for nothing. The only thing which suffices is the Grace of the Lord they have betrayed, and it's perfect in weakness.

For the prayers of all the saints who have shone forth in Kiev and its lands, o Lord, have mercy and protect Your people in the Ukraine.
ACatharina9/8/2018 10:37 am
Well, we all knew this day would come. Honestly, I have this feeling that instead of a genuine church (which Ukraine already has) they will create a nest full of vipers and so called agents-in-cassocks. Not immediately, but I fear what sort of people will come to serve there in upcoming years. And what about the holy sites of Ukraine? The vipers may attempt to seize them through godless secular law and this could cause great unrest in the whole Orthodox world.
I don't want to spread fears of the future, but there are so many things that can go wrong after the unfortunate patriarch's move.
Steve Cox9/8/2018 9:32 am
This scares me for the people of Ukraine and for the Orthodox Church in general. I hope this doesn't cause a split in the Church as in 1054. First a robber council in Crete and now this.
Castrese Tipaldi9/8/2018 9:23 am
The apostates of Istambul continue to honor their masonic pledge to sow unceasingly scandals and confusion in the Church of Christ, as they have done since 1920, when Meletios broke the liturgical unity of the Christians adopting the Papist calendar.

In the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, I testify before God and men that I am not in Communion with Bartholomew, a second order employee of the prince of this world, and whoever agree and support this satanic move, which has the potential to ignite a full conflagration in the Ukraine.
May the Lord reward them all according to their deeds.

To my hierarchies, in full humility: get out of that damned World Council of churches!
JEinCA9/8/2018 7:18 am
So this settles it! Bartholomew is a heretic who must be anathematized. Not that many of us weren't thinking as such beforehand.
John9/8/2018 6:01 am
St. John of Shanghai and SF said this 1972:

"In sum, the Ecumenical Patriarchate, in theory embracing almost the whole universe and in fact extending its authority only over several dioceses, and in other places having only a higher superficial supervision and receiving certain revenues for this, persecuted by the government at home and not supported by any governmental authority abroad: having lost its significance as a pillar of truth and having itself become a source of division, and at the same time being possessed by an exorbitant love of power—represents a pitiful spectacle which recalls the worst periods in the history of the See of Constantinople."
Here you can leave your comment on the present article, not exceeding 700 characters. All comments will be read by the editors of OrthoChristian.Com.
Enter through FaceBook
Your name:
Your e-mail:
Enter the digits, seen on picture:

Characters remaining: 700

Subscribe
to our mailing list

* indicates required
×