The Catholic Reform of the Lord’s Prayer is Irreverent to Christ Himself

Pope Francis of Rome has confirmed the new publication of the Missal book, which determines the order of conducting the Mass, introducing changes into the text of the Gospel Lord’s Prayer, also known as the “Our Father”. Thus, in the new edition the words of the prayer, “and lead us not into temptation” (non indurci in tentazione) will be changed to “don’t let us fall into temptation” (non abbandonarci alla tentazione). This decision of Pope Francis, as well as the possibility of a visit by the head of the Roman Catholic church to Russia was discussed by the well known professor of the Moscow Theological Academy Alexei Ilyich Osipov with the Tsargrad TV.

Photo: www.globallookpress.com Photo: www.globallookpress.com     

Alexei Ilyich, back in 2017 Pope Francis announced that he is not satisfied with the gospel text of the Lord’s Prayer, inasmuch as the words, “lead us not into temptation” lead the faithful to a false understanding—as though God Himself can tempt man. But now it is not simply the personal opinion of the head of the Vatican—changes have been entered into the service books. What is the reason for this, and is it at all acceptable to “edit” the words of Christ Himself?

—The reason is obvious: It’s true that these words of the Lord’s Prayer are sometimes not correctly understood. But note: When in scholarly literature we cite even the most elementary author, regardless of how he expressed himself, be it clear enough, be it literary enough, we cite his words without changing them. Only afterwards, in a citation if needed, do we comment on it—either directly or in an interlinear notation.

And in this case they are the words of Christ Himself! How do we dare change them?! Make a comment if you want, but to say that the Lord’s Prayer should be read “like this”, and you, Lord Jesus, didn’t express yourself “fortunately”, is something I consider to be an expression of utter irreverence towards Christ Himself. And this is yet another proof that the papal title, “Vicar of Christ on Earth” is not simply a formal phrase, but a very real, although poorly acknowledged pridefulness. It is yet another proof of what Catholicism really is.

Photo: Andreas Zernd / Shutterstock.com Photo: Andreas Zernd / Shutterstock.com   

In fact, there has never yet been such a liberal pope as Francis. Earlier I thought that there could not be a worse pope than John-Paul II, but it turns out that I was wrong. The previous pope [before Francis], Benedict XVI, was a true Catholic—serious and with convictions. But no, he wasn’t suitable. Well, and Francis is not only a man of our age in the sense of the times, but a man of our age in thoughts, the spirit of our age. He is a man who is not ashamed to take steps that cross over the line of reverence towards Holy Scripture, and the teaching of Christ.

Remember how he dared to called Christ a “devil”: At one five-minute sermon he said it several times in explaining one apostolic saying—he used that word. Jesuit! That’s Jesuitism for you! By the way, Yuri Feodorovich Samarin (a Russian Slavophile philosopher.—Tsargrad] made an excellent assessment of Jesuitism in his brochure, “Jesuits and their relationship to Russia.”

Incidentally, this last point is extremely relevant today. It turns out that in theological matters Pope Francis is a true liberal, but with regard to his authority and influence, including in Ukraine, where the Uniate Greek Catholics are wreaking havoc, he is totalitarian?

—He is totalitarian both in this case and the other—“I do what I want. I don’t reckon with the Holy Tradition of the Church.” And concerning his attempts to establish authority over everything that belongs to him, and everything he would like to belong to him, Pope Francis is fully conducting the former politics of Rome.

Here, (in theological matters.—Tsargrad) we see what “things” pop up. There it is: the “Vicar of Christ on Earth!” Even Cicero had an explanation of religion from the word, “reverence”. And where there is no reverence, there is truly no religion. Here, under the flag of, “we must explain to people what Christ meant”, they dare to change His words!

In this context, I can’t help but ask this concluding question. Recently in the course of his uninvited (from the Bulgarian Orthodox Church) visit to Bulgaria, Pope Francis expressed the desire to “take a trip to Russia”. How do you view the very possibility of such a visit?

—I see no positive aspects that could come for our Church and our people as a result of such a visit. But there are loads of negatives!

Professor Alexei Osipov. Photo: www.mpda.ru Professor Alexei Osipov. Photo: www.mpda.ru     

Remember what happened during papal visits to Orthodox countries (Ukraine, Georgia, and of course Bulgaria). A huge number of foreign correspondents descend, everyone in the press shouts and screeches, “The Pope! The Pope!” and for many people who are not yet stable in their faith, who do not understand the difference between Catholicism and Orthodoxy, such a visit could be like a hammer blow against their faith.

Therefore I consider that a visit by the pope could become a very strong blow against our entire nation and the Orthodox Christian faithful. We have to remember, that the spirit of Catholicism is absolutely worldly; there is almost nothing religious there about it anymore. Even back in the nineteenth century St. Theophan the Recluse said very precisely and well that the Catholics have not a church but a political corporation. So, such a visit would bring absolutely no benefit to our Church or people—there can be no doubt about it.

Mikhail Tiurenkov
spoke with Professor Alexei Osipov
Translation by OrthoChristian.com

Tsargard TV

6/26/2019

See also
The Roman Catholic “Anaconda Plan”: Challenges and Threats Facing Ukrainian Orthodoxy The Roman Catholic “Anaconda Plan”: Challenges and Threats Facing Ukrainian Orthodoxy The Roman Catholic “Anaconda Plan”: Challenges and Threats Facing Ukrainian Orthodoxy The Roman Catholic “Anaconda Plan”: Challenges and Threats Facing Ukrainian Orthodoxy
Taras Melnick
The implementation of the “OCU” project has become a serious milestone on the road to the Vatican’s success in its multi-layered and coordinated strategy in the creeping Catholicization of the Ukraine.
Remission of Sins, and False Christian Love and Forgiveness Remission of Sins, and False Christian Love and Forgiveness
Abp. Averky (Taushev)
Remission of Sins, and False Christian Love and Forgiveness Remission of Sins, and False Christian Love and Forgiveness
Archbishop Averky (Taushev)
How understandable this is, how logical and how completely opposite this clear and definite, pure Gospel teaching is to the propaganda so fashionable today of some pseudo-Christian love and unconditional all-forgiveness, just too all-encompassing, which supposedly extends even to the enemies of the Christian faith who actively war with the Church and faith in God itself and are undoubtedly the servants of the coming Antichrist!
 Does Orthodoxy Need Monastic Orders? Does Orthodoxy Need Monastic Orders?
Schema-Archimandrite Gabriel (Bunge) speaks about Catholic reforms, Orthodox tradition and the most important objective of monasticism
 Does Orthodoxy Need Monastic Orders? Does Orthodoxy Need Monastic Orders?
Schema-Archimandrite Gabriel (Bunge) speaks about Catholic reforms, Orthodox tradition and the most important objective of monasticism
Schema-Archimandrite Gabriel Bunge, Vasily Tsuper
Monasticism does not exist for any specific purposes related to this world. To quote an anonymous author of The History of Egyptian Monks (fourth century), “From the very beginning, the purpose of monasticism was following Christ in the desert, singing hymns and psalms and waiting for our Lord to come.” This seeming “uselessness” makes monasticism free from any services within the Church structure.
How Our World Stopped Being Christian: Anatomy of a Collapse How Our World Stopped Being Christian: Anatomy of a Collapse
Jean-Claude Larchet
How Our World Stopped Being Christian: Anatomy of a Collapse How Our World Stopped Being Christian: Anatomy of a Collapse
Jean-Claude Larchet
Whatever the external factors might have been that could have played a role in the collapse of Catholicism (modern attitudes, social pressure, etc.), the internal factors are what appear to be decisive according to the author of this book.
The Shape of the Lord’s Prayer The Shape of the Lord’s Prayer The Shape of the Lord’s Prayer The Shape of the Lord’s Prayer
Fr. Sava Medakovic
It has been identified that a rhetorical literary structure known as chiasmus is the most frequent literary pattern in both the Old and New Testaments.
A Comparison: Francis of Assisi and St. Seraphim of Sarov A Comparison: Francis of Assisi and St. Seraphim of Sarov
Mitrophan Lodyzhensky
A Comparison: Francis of Assisi and St. Seraphim of Sarov A Comparison: Francis of Assisi and St. Seraphim of Sarov
Mitrophan Lodyzhensky
In contrast to Francis, St Seraphim did not seek to “feel himself transformed into Jesus” through his prayers and labors. He prayed simply and deeply, repenting of his sins.
Comments
Editor11/17/2020 1:41 pm
Henry Law: Our translation comes down to us from the Greek, which was a lingua franca contemporary to the Aramaic original. It's best to stick with the King James Version of the New Testament, which is the closest English version to the original texts. What you cited is just another example of the Vatican's developing doctrine and devolving biblical language.
Henry Law11/17/2020 1:52 am
Do we know what is the original text, presumably it would have been Hebrew or Aramaic. There is much discussion on this subject in Wikipedia. It is conceivable that the Latin text has been wrong from the start. Strange things happen in translation. At some time in the 1960s, "thy will be done in earth as it is is heaven" became "on earth".
Gary Cox6/26/2019 11:44 am
I think Benedict tried to straighten out the homosexuality problems the RC has and to return to more of a maybe early 1900's form of Catholicism. THAT type of conviction and seriousness. BUT, even that didn't happen. And he didn't give up on the idea of the Catholic church having a universal bishop. But back to the issue of changing the wording of The Lord's Prayer, words have meaning and we have understood this meaning through a little something called Tradition! How can something be changed because he wants it changed? Because he thinks his is first over equals? Bad idea for Francis and bad idea for Bartholomew. Gary Cox
Basil6/26/2019 9:15 am
"The previous pope [before Francis], Benedict XVI, was a true Catholic—serious and with convictions."

This is simply not true: Benedict XVI preaches the same satanic anti-gospel as the other modern leaders of the Vatican sect:

https://www.vaticannews.va/en/church/news/2018-11/pope-emeritus-benedict-dialogue-with-the-jews-not-mission.html
Here you can leave your comment on the present article, not exceeding 4000 characters. All comments will be read by the editors of OrthoChristian.Com.
Enter through FaceBook
Your name:
Your e-mail:
Enter the digits, seen on picture:

Characters remaining: 4000

Subscribe
to our mailing list

* indicates required
×