Churches endanger own autocephaly by not simply accepting decisions of Constantinople, schismatic primate says

Kiev, December 6, 2019

Photo: bbci.co.uk Photo: bbci.co.uk     

The Local Churches should not exercise their independence, but should “simply recognize” the Patriarchate of Constantinople’s actions in Ukraine, believes Epiphany Dumenko, the head of the schismatic “Orthodox Church of Ukraine” that was created by ex-President Petro Poroshenko and Patriarch Bartholomew last year.

Otherwise, the Local Churches put their own autocephalies at risk, Dumenko believes. Constantinople representatives themselves, such as Archbishop Job (Getcha), have voiced as much in the past, saying that Constantinople gave and Constantinople can take away autocephaly, thus attributing a de-facto jurisdiction over the other Local Churches to Constantinople.

In a recent interview with the BBC, Dumenko attributes the difficulty of the process of recognition of his OCU not to its canonical irregularity, being an amalgamation of two groups that willfully remained in schism for 30 years, but to pressure from the Russian state and Church: “The Russian state represented by the ROC was involved in the process of persistent opposition to the recognition of Ukrainian autocephaly by other local Orthodox Churches.”

The Synods of several Local Churches’ themselves have, on the other hand, pointed to the OCU’s lack of Apostolic Succession and lack of true ordinations as being among the reasons they cannot recognize the OCU, though Dumenko does not address that in his interview.

Despite the difficulties, “today there are many positive messages from other Local Orthodox Churches,” Dumenko asserts, referring to so-called “hybrid” recognitions, where hierarchs of Local Churches that do not recognize the OCU have taken it upon themselves to concelebrate with the schismatics.

On the feast of St. Vladimir in July, a hierarch of the Greek Church, Metropolitan Ioannis of Langadas, concelebrated with the schismatics, though the Greek Church had not yet recognized them. Dumenko immediately declared this was “de-facto recognition,” thus forcing the Metropolis to issue a statement denying this assertion. However, for Dumenko, the Metropolis’ statement came because the Russian Church “raised a fuss.”

He also points to the recent incident in which Bishop Isaiah of Šumperk of the Church of the Czech Lands and Slovakia concelebrated with the schismatics as an example of “hybrid recognition,” though he does not note that Bp. Isaiah was specifically warned by his own primate, His Beatitude Metropolitan Rostislav, that he will face canonical sanctions from the Synod if he concelebrates.

He also notes that a Cypriot hierarch recently concelebrated with the schismatics in Constantinople, and that two Bulgarian bishops reportedly celebrated at a Divine Liturgy in Langadas, Greece, where the name of Epiphany Dumenko was commemorated.

However, there are serious questions about the news regarding the Bulgarian bishops, as the story traces to Archimandrite Romanos (Anastasiadis), a known Constantinople propagandist, and according to Orthodox liturgics, regular hierarchs commemorate the local primate, while only primates commemorate the other primates, showing with whom they share Eucharistic communion.

Thus, if the primates, including Epiphany Dumenko were commemorated, it was an example of liturgical abuse, and Fr. Romanos offers no evidence that the Bulgarian hierarchs were aware and consented to such commemorations.

It is true, however, that Greek hierarchs have altered the liturgical order of their own accord in the past in order to show support for the Ukrainian schismatic. The retired Metropolitan Chrysostomos of Zakynthos of the Greek Orthodox had his deacon commemorate the primates, including Dumenko, in December 2018.

“I think that in the future they will definitely make a positive decision on the recognition of our autocephalous status… We see that the ROC is trying to put pressure on the hierarchy, and therefore the representatives of the Local Churches are now waiting to a certain extent, do not speak publicly, and then only finally announce the decision. I think that will be the case with many Local Churches that will give us good news and recognition early next year,” Dumenko said.

He also stressed that the other Local Churches should not question the actions of the Patriarchate of Constantinople in Ukraine, since, “historically, he has the right to make such decisions.”

As Dumenko believes, a Local Church cannot exercise its independence and express its own view without endangering itself: “Other Churches should simply recognize this act, which was committed by the Ecumenical Patriarch, not question it. For if this or that Local Orthodox Church questions the decision of the Ecumenical Patriarch, it also puts its autocephaly at risk. Therefore, the Ecumenical Patriarch now communicates with other primates, his representatives convey a clear position and persuade them that other Churches should support the decision of Constantinople,” Epiphany concluded.

Last October, Patriarch Bartholomew also declared that the Russian Church has no choice but to accept Constantinople’s actions, dismissing the historical, canonical, and dogmatic arguments against them as “black propaganda.”

Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Vkontakte, and Telegram!

12/6/2019

See also
Schismatic pilgrims find warm welcome on Evia after being rejected on Aegina Schismatic pilgrims find warm welcome on Evia after being rejected on Aegina Schismatic pilgrims find warm welcome on Evia after being rejected on Aegina Schismatic pilgrims find warm welcome on Evia after being rejected on Aegina
The pilgrims from the schismatic “Orthodox Church of Ukraine,” headed by “Metropolitans” Simeon Shostasky and Alexander Drabinko, who are currently visiting holy sites in Greece, found a warm welcome on the island of Evia and in Fokidos after being shut out on the island of Aegina and in Patras.
Schismatic hierarchs reportedly not allowed to serve Liturgies during pilgrimage to Greece Schismatic hierarchs reportedly not allowed to serve Liturgies during pilgrimage to Greece Schismatic hierarchs reportedly not allowed to serve Liturgies during pilgrimage to Greece Schismatic hierarchs reportedly not allowed to serve Liturgies during pilgrimage to Greece
In connection with the protests of local clergy and changes in the schedule, the delegation went to the Monastery of the Annunciation in Nea Makri, but Shostasky and Drabinko were not allowed to serve there either at the Sunday service, though they were allowed to remain in the church.
No parishes have joined Ukrainian schismatic church in past 2.5 months No parishes have joined Ukrainian schismatic church in past 2.5 months No parishes have joined Ukrainian schismatic church in past 2.5 months No parishes have joined Ukrainian schismatic church in past 2.5 months
According to data from the interactive map showing parish transitions from the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Chruch to the schismatic “Orthodox Church of Ukraine” (OCU), no parishes have joined the schismatic structure in the past 2.5 months.
It is Unacceptable to Have Eucharistic Communion with Unordained Schismatics It is Unacceptable to Have Eucharistic Communion with Unordained Schismatics
Metropolitan Nikephoros of Kykkos and Tellyria
It is Unacceptable to Have Eucharistic Communion with Unordained Schismatics It is Unacceptable to Have Eucharistic Communion with Unordained Schismatics
Commentary on the Ukrainian Issue for the Cypriot Holy Synod
Metropolitan Nikephoros of Kykkos and Tellyria
I can draw only one conclusion. Sadly enough, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew’s granting of autocephalous status to the schismatic community of Philaret and Epiphany not only did not heal the existing schism in Ukraine, but on the contrary, aggravated it.
Constantinople’s goal is to impose its authority over the entire Church—Met. Daniil of Bulgarian Church Constantinople’s goal is to impose its authority over the entire Church—Met. Daniil of Bulgarian Church Constantinople’s goal is to impose its authority over the entire Church—Met. Daniil of Bulgarian Church Constantinople’s goal is to impose its authority over the entire Church—Met. Daniil of Bulgarian Church
The actions of the Patriarchate of Constantinople, including in Ukraine, show that it’s more important for Patriarch Bartholomew to impose his power over the Orthodox Church than to find consent and unity, His Eminence Metropolitan Daniil of Vidin of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church stated to RIA-Novosti yesterday.
Epiphany Dumenko is impostor, says Met. Rostislav of Czech-Slovak Church Epiphany Dumenko is impostor, says Met. Rostislav of Czech-Slovak Church Epiphany Dumenko is impostor, says Met. Rostislav of Czech-Slovak Church Epiphany Dumenko is impostor, says Met. Rostislav of Czech-Slovak Church
His Beatitude Metropolitan Rostislav of the Czech Lands and Slovakia visited Moscow over the weekend for the celebration of the 10th anniversary of the enthronement of His Holiness Patriarch Kirill as the primate of the Russian Church, where he celebrated the Divine Liturgy at his Church’s representation parish of St. Nicholas of Myra on Sunday, February 3—the same day that “Metropolitan” Epiphany Dumenko was enthroned as the primate of the Ukrainian schismatics in Kiev.
Comments
Mark Betts12/10/2019 4:26 am
So, the American politicians can control what the Ecumenical Patriarch does, while the said Patriarch has supreme authority over all the other Local Churches. That means America actually runs the whole of world Orthodoxy, according to Dumenko. This is why I feel the title "Ecumenical Patriarch" is no longer appropriate for the Patriarch of Constantinople, as he does not and cannot fulfil that roll. It needs to be removed from him.
ACatharina12/6/2019 6:11 pm
If the hierarchs blindly obey their superiors, without questioning wheter their fruit is of Spirit or the devils, then they will be easily led astray by antichrist. The hierarchs and laymen alike are not supposed to be dumb sheep, but wise as serpents and innocent as doves! Fulfilling the law for the law's sake and not for God is just pharisaical, even if the law was granted by God.
Renato 12/6/2019 2:14 pm
Il signor Bartolomeo è ancora ortodosso? Il papismo è un'eresia
Here you can leave your comment on the present article, not exceeding 4000 characters. All comments will be read by the editors of OrthoChristian.Com.
Enter through FaceBook
Your name:
Your e-mail:
Enter the digits, seen on picture:

Characters remaining: 4000

Subscribe
to our mailing list

* indicates required
×