Ukrainian schismatics amend liturgical practices to match Constantinople

Kiev, December 12, 2019

    

The Synod of Bishops of the schismatic “Orthodox Church of Ukraine,” headed by “Metropolitan” Epiphany Dumenko, gathered in Kiev on December 5, announced amendments to the celebration of the Divine Liturgy aimed at bringing the OCU’s liturgical practices closer to that of the Patriarchate of Constantinople.

In particular, it was decided that the reading of the troparion of the Third Hour during the Eucharistic Canon in the Liturgies of St. John Chrysostom and St. Basil the Great would be optional, and that the Litany of Catechumens would not be prayed in parishes that do not have any of their own catechumens, reports the official OCU website.

The OCU “hierarchs” noted that the decision regarding the Troparion of the Third Hour corresponds to a long tradition “that is now followed by the rites of the Divine Liturgy in the Greek language.”

The Synod also stated that, “taking into account the liturgical practice of other Local Churches, in particular, the Ecumenical Patriarchate and the Church of Greece, it was decided to pronounce the Litany of the Catechumens only in parishes where there are catechumens—those who are preparing for Baptism and are being catechized.”

In this way, the Liturgy will better correspond to the needs of those present, the Synod writes.

The bishop’s use of his staff during the services is also “streamlined,” taking into account the practices of other Local Churches.

The Synod’s decisions are not without controversy. “Patriarch” Philaret Denisenko, the head of the schismatic “Kiev Patriarchate,” whom the OCU still considers to be a member of its own Synod, stated that, “The Synod of the OCU demonstrated its dependence on the Greek tradition by making changes in the Divine Liturgy, and, it seems to me, is unconsciously preparing a religious war in Ukraine.”

The liturgical practices adopted are legitimate practices, in use by other Local Churches, though the Synod’s decision comes against the background of OCU hierarchs and laity having demonstrated their motivation of becoming more like Constantinople and moving away from Ukrainian traditions in order to be less like Russia several times.

In Lutsk, a group of activists asked a blessing to celebrate the Nativity of Christ according to the New Calendar on December 25 in order to differentiate themselves from “the aggressor Russia.” Their request found the support of “Metropolitan” Mikhail Zinkevich of Lutsk and Volyn, and the issue has since been backed by several other OCU clergymen.

Last December, Epiphany Dumenko himself, the primate of the OCU, stated that the Ukrainian Church should change its stance on LGBT issues to move away from the “Russian conservative tradition.”

Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Vkontakte, and Telegram!

12/12/2019

Comments
Jesse Dominick12/14/2019 11:31 am
Jacob, there's no double talk here. The point of the article isn't to try to make it look like the OCU has made unprecedented changes, because these practices ARE in use in other jurisdictions. The reading of the Third Hour Troparion in the Anaphora is a later interpolation and wasn't added in the practice of all Local Churches. The article is clear enough about why we brought it up - they made these changes, not because they believe them to be more legitimate or more ancient, but in order to be more like Constantionple. The point is that the OCU makes many decisions solely for the sake of being not like Russia and being more like Constantinople. So here they are turning away from the Ukrainain liturgical practices they inherited in orer to be more like the Greek Churches. This is exactly what Philaret has been saying about them, and it helps to show that they are less of a Ukrainian church than a Constantinople church.
Jacob12/12/2019 8:26 pm
“The liturgical practices adopted are LEGITIMATE PRACTICES, in use by other Local Churches, though the Synod’s decision comes against the background of OCU hierarchs and laity having demonstrated their motivation of becoming more like Constantinople and moving away from Ukrainian traditions in order to be less like Russia several times.” This website constantly commits this sort of double talk, and its very confusing. The political games being played on this site in the way news is being reported is terrible. If it’s a “legitimate practice” according to the canons of the church and teachings of the Holy Fathers, then why even bring it up. You know very well that it’s not a legitimate practice to remove the prayers of the catechumens from the liturgy and it reflects the modernist spirit alive and well in many local churches. It was and still is a huge point of contention between the authentic orthodox believers and the ecumenical followers. Maybe we should only pray for rain, “healthful seasons and an abundance of the fruit of the earth” in farming communities to “properly accommodate the needs of the people” ? Ridiculous!!
Here you can leave your comment on the present article, not exceeding 4000 characters. All comments will be read by the editors of OrthoChristian.Com.
Enter through FaceBook
Your name:
Your e-mail:
Enter the digits, seen on picture:

Characters remaining: 4000

Subscribe
to our mailing list

* indicates required
×