Russian Council of Bishops: Crete Council significant step but not pan-Orthodox

Moscow, December 5, 2017

Photo: RIA-Novosti Photo: RIA-Novosti
    

The 2017 meeting of the Council of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church, which concluded its work on Saturday, offered its evaluation of the Council of Crete that gathered representatives from 10 of the 15 Local Churches last summer and the documents it released, calling it a significant event in Orthodox history, but not pan-Orthodox, reports the site of the Russian Orthodox Church.

“The Council cannot be considered pan-Orthodox, nor its decisions as obligatory for all the fullness of Orthodoxy, inasmuch as in the absence of the agreement of a number of Local autocephalous Churches on the conducting of the Council by the previously agreed upon terms, the principle of consensus was violated,” the hierarchs write in the Russian council’s final document, “Resolutions of the Sacred Council of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church (November 29-December 2, 2017).”

“However, the Council of Crete should be recognized as a significant event in the history of the Orthodox Church,” the bishops continue. As Metropolitan Hilarion (Alfeyev) of Volokolamsk told RIA-Novosti during the Council of Bishops, the Russian Church generally accepts Crete as an important step towards a truly pan-Orthodox council, but that its documents are in need of revisions and clarifications.

The recent council thereby approved the evaluation of Crete that had previously been included in the decision of the Russian Orthodox Holy Synod’s July 15, 2016 meeting.

“Analysis of the documents of the Crete Council … has shown that several of them contain vague and ambiguous wording that does not allow them to be considered exemplary expressions of the truth of the Orthodox faith and of the Tradition of the Church,” the Russian hierarchs’ document continues, adding that this especially applies to the highly-controversial “Relations of the Orthodox Church with the Rest of the Christian World” document, which, as the bishops note, was not signed by 2/3 of the Serbian delegation, as well as individual hierarchs of other Local Orthodox Churches.

His Holiness Patriarch Kirill of Moscow noted the same issue in his presentation on the opening day of the Council of Bishops. Although 17 of 24 Serbian bishops did not sign the above-mentioned document, it was officially adopted by the Council on Crete, including the Serbian Church. “All this raises questions not only about compliance with the pan-Orthodox-approved procedures for the Council of Crete, but about how much the documents adopted by it truly express a genuine consensus in our Orthodox family,” the Russian primate observed.

His Holiness also noted that several other documents from Crete are in need of critical revisions.

The critical attitudes expressed by the Antiochian, Bulgarian, and Georgian Holy Synods, as well as by individual hierarchs of other Synods, and the Sacred Community and individual monasteries of Mt. Athos towards the Crete Council were also noted by the Russian Council of Bishops, stating that there is an ambiguous attitude towards the Council within the Orthodox Christian family.

The document concludes its remarks on Crete by noting that the preservation and strengthening of the unity of the holy Orthodox Church is the shared responsibility of all the Local Churches, regardless of their evaluation of Crete, thus the bishops call for increased inter-Orthodox cooperation.

12/5/2017

See also
Disputed Athonite statement on Crete Council sparks controversy Disputed Athonite statement on Crete Council sparks controversy Disputed Athonite statement on Crete Council sparks controversy Disputed Athonite statement on Crete Council sparks controversy
The 206th Extraordinary Double Sacred Synaxis of the Holy Mountain, consisting of twenty extraordinary and ordinary representatives of the Holy Community met on June 17/30 to analyze a text, a translation of which is available on the blog Mystagogy. It is known in the Church of Greece that the text was composed not at the session itself, but beforehand by Archimandrite Vasileios (Gondikakis), the former abbot of both Stavronikita and Iveron Monasteries, who is known to be close to the patriarchate in Constantinople. Although the text has been issued on behalf of the entire Sacred Community, it is also know that several of the Athonite monasteries disputed the document.
Met. Ambrose of Kalavryta to Pat. Bartholomew: “The council on Crete is a path to schism” Met. Ambrose of Kalavryta to Pat. Bartholomew: “The council on Crete is a path to schism” Met. Ambrose of Kalavryta to Pat. Bartholomew: “The council on Crete is a path to schism” Met. Ambrose of Kalavryta to Pat. Bartholomew: “The council on Crete is a path to schism”
In his view, the main result of the “notorious” Crete Council, which was neither holy nor great in his estimation, is that the Orthodox Church has divided into factions, and the Christian flock has been brought to confusion and turmoil. “In fact, a new schism is developing,” Met. Ambrose writes.
Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos: texts of Crete Council in need of theological refinement Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos: texts of Crete Council in need of theological refinement Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos: texts of Crete Council in need of theological refinement Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos: texts of Crete Council in need of theological refinement
Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos, being a member of the Greek Orthodox Church’s delegation at the Crete Council, refused to sign the final document “Relations of the Orthodox Church With the Rest of the Christian World.” At a November session of the Greek Orthodox Holy Synod, Vladyka expressed the opinion that the Crete Council was not properly prepared for and did not represent a council of bishops, but a council of primates and their entourages.
I did not sign the text I did not sign the text "Relations of the Orthodox Church with the Rest of the Christian World"
Metropolitan Athanasios of Limassol
I did not sign the text I did not sign the text "Relations of the Orthodox Church with the Rest of the Christian World"
Metropolitan Athanasios of Limassol
The Orthodox Church of Christ never lost the “unity of faith and the communion of the Holy Spirit” and does not accept the theory of the restoration of the unity of those “who believe in Christ,” because it believes that the unity of those who believe in Christ already exists in the unity of all of Her baptized children, between themselves and with Christ, in Her correct faith, where no heretics or schismatics are present, for which reason She prays for their return to Orthodoxy in repentance.
Georgian Patriarch explains why they will not participate in the Pan-Orthodox Council Georgian Patriarch explains why they will not participate in the Pan-Orthodox Council Georgian Patriarch explains why they will not participate in the Pan-Orthodox Council Georgian Patriarch explains why they will not participate in the Pan-Orthodox Council
Earlier the Georgian Orthodox Church made public the eleven point agenda of the meeting of the Holy Synod, clarifying the reasons why it is not participating in the Council, including “the failure to restore eucharistic communion between the Antiochian and Jerusalem Churches."
Address of the brothers of the Holy Dormition Pochaev Lavra and of the Holy Spirit skete of the Lavra in connection with the forthcoming Pan-Orthodox Council Address of the brothers of the Holy Dormition Pochaev Lavra and of the Holy Spirit skete of the Lavra in connection with the forthcoming Pan-Orthodox Council Address of the brothers of the Holy Dormition Pochaev Lavra and of the Holy Spirit skete of the Lavra in connection with the forthcoming Pan-Orthodox Council Address of the brothers of the Holy Dormition Pochaev Lavra and of the Holy Spirit skete of the Lavra in connection with the forthcoming Pan-Orthodox Council
The brothers of the Pochaev Lavra are in solidarity and agreement with the opinions of the Holy Synod of the Bulgarian Orthodox Church, the Episcopal Synod of ROCOR, the Holy Kinot of Holy Mount Athos, the Kamanets-Podolsk diocese of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, and Metropolitan Athanasios of Limassol (Orthodox Church of Cyprus)
Comments
Steve cox12/6/2017 12:55 pm
I too am heartened by this statement from the Russian Church and very thankful. So many of us are worried about the Church giving up the faith to be part of a one world religion. The Bishops are maintaining the truth. Thanks to God!!!
Fr William (Bauer)12/5/2017 8:25 pm
I am heartened by this article.
Here you can leave your comment on the present article, not exceeding 700 characters. All comments will be read by the editors of OrthoChristian.Com.
Enter through FaceBook , or enter your information:
Your name:
Your e-mail:
Enter the digits, seen on picture:

Characters remaining: 700

×