Fr. John Whiteford presents at international theological conference on Ukrainian crisis in Moscow

Moscow, February 27, 2019

Photo: Facebook Photo: Facebook The international academic-practical conference “Causes and Challenges of the Present Crisis in Inter-Orthodox Relations,” dedicated to discussing the crisis arising from the non-canonical actions of the Patriarchate of Constantinople in Ukraine opened at St. Tikhon’s Orthodox University for the Humanities in Moscow on Monday, reports the press service of the Russian Orthodox Church.

The conference gathered presenters from Russia, Bulgaria, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Two monks from Mt. Athos were unable to attend at the last minute but sent their presentation to be read.

And offering “A Look at the Church Division from the USA” was the well-known Archpriest John Whiteford of St. Jonah Orthodox Church (Russian Orthodox Church Outside of Russia) in Spring, Texas, who was invited because his articles are also known and read in Russia.

The conference began with the Divine Liturgy in the Church of St. Vladimir in the Moscow Diocesan House, where the great Local Council of 1917-1918 was held that gathered more than 40 hierarchs and clergymen who went on to join the ranks of the New Martyrs and Confessors of Russia.

The conference was then opened by His Eminence Archbishop Ambrose of Verey, the rector of the Moscow Theological Academy, who noted that the crisis arising from the actions of the Patriarchate of Constantinople is about more than just the question of autocephaly in Ukraine, but of canon law, the relations of the Local Churches, and the role of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.

The discussion of these issues from different angles in the various Local Churches contributes to the gradual emergence of a consensus, Abp. Ambrose said, but “the well-known events push everyone to resolve this issue as soon as possible.”

The first session of the conference was dedicated to a theological analysis of the Church crisis and included presentations focusing on ecclesiology, the context of Church events in Ukraine, and the primacy of Constantinople.

The second session was dedicated to views on the Church crisis from abroad, during which Fr. John offered his presentation.

The third session was dedicated to the historical side of the crisis in Ukraine and included presentations on defending the unity of the Russian Church, schisms in Ukraine over the past century, and the Constantinople-Renovationist fight against the Russian Church.

“I talked about why people in America care about what’s going on, how it affects us. For example, I pointed out that in some ways it affects us more than it does people in Russia. Obviously the people in Ukraine are the most affected, but outside of Ukraine, they don’t have Ecumenical Patriarchate parishes around them and people that they’ve had relations with and families that straddle parishes and are connected to both that suddenly find themselves not in communion anymore,” Fr. John said of his presentation in an interview with OrthoChristian.

“That’s a problem that we have. It also affects our witness,” he added.

“Ever since I became Orthodox one of the big things I’ve been concerned with is trying to bring people into the Church. You can’t bring people into the Church as easily now when it’s harder to explain what Orthodoxy is,” giving the poor relations between the two most visible branches of the Orthodox Church.

“The waters have been muddied, and over something that has no basis in the canons or traditions. It’s just a power grab,” Fr. John lamented.

Fr. John also noted that he received some positive comments after his talk and that it seems to have been well received.

Follow us on Facebook!

2/27/2019

See also
Is There Cause to Interrupt Eucharistic Communion? Is There Cause to Interrupt Eucharistic Communion?
Anna Stickles
Is There Cause to Interrupt Eucharistic Communion? Is There Cause to Interrupt Eucharistic Communion?
Anna Stickles
The question I think that needs asked is—is the issue in the present case simply a territorial dispute?
It is Unacceptable to Have Eucharistic Communion with Unordained Schismatics It is Unacceptable to Have Eucharistic Communion with Unordained Schismatics
Met. Nikiforos of Kykkos
It is Unacceptable to Have Eucharistic Communion with Unordained Schismatics It is Unacceptable to Have Eucharistic Communion with Unordained Schismatics
Commentary on the Ukrainian Issue for the Cypriot Holy Synod
Metropolitan Nikiforos of Kykkos
I can draw only one conclusion. Sadly enough, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew’s granting of autocephalous status to the schismatic community of Philaret and Epiphany not only did not heal the existing schism in Ukraine, but on the contrary, aggravated it.
“Hear the Lamentations of the Faithful” “Hear the Lamentations of the Faithful”
Met. Luke of Zaporozhye and Melitopol
“Hear the Lamentations of the Faithful” “Hear the Lamentations of the Faithful”
An Open Letter of Metropolitan Luke of Zaporozhye and Melitopol to His Holiness Catholics-Patriarch Ilia II of All Georgia
Metropolitan Luke of Zaporozhye and Melitopol
The apotheosis of this lawlessness was the formation of the so-called “Orthodox Church of Ukraine” on the basis of structures that had fallen away from the Mother Church, whose autocephaly the Patriarchate of Constantinople single-handedly established by issuing a tomos.
Comments on the Archons’ Town Hall Meeting on Ukrainian Autocephaly Comments on the Archons’ Town Hall Meeting on Ukrainian Autocephaly
Jesse Dominick
Comments on the Archons’ Town Hall Meeting on Ukrainian Autocephaly Comments on the Archons’ Town Hall Meeting on Ukrainian Autocephaly
Jesse Dominick
The Archons are Patriarch Bartholomew’s PR arm and fundraisers and few expected anything new from this meeting—the right of the Ecumenical Patriarchate to intervene in any Church situation anywhere, any time would be asserted again with little real engagement of the serious issues involved in every aspect of the current Church crisis in Ukraine and Constantinople’s role in it.
About Good Doctor Aibolit and the Greek Orthodox Church About Good Doctor Aibolit and the Greek Orthodox Church
Priest Sergei Begiyan
About Good Doctor Aibolit and the Greek Orthodox Church About Good Doctor Aibolit and the Greek Orthodox Church
Priest Sergei Begiyan
To understand that Patriarch Bartholomew is by no means a good doctor, that he pursues completely specific materialistic goals, we must forget for a while about the current conflict and recall another. We must remember the Greek Orthodox Church.
On the Future of Orthodoxy in Ukraine and in the World On the Future of Orthodoxy in Ukraine and in the World
Abp. Theodosy (Snigirev)
On the Future of Orthodoxy in Ukraine and in the World On the Future of Orthodoxy in Ukraine and in the World
A Conversation with Archbishop Theodosy (Snigirev)
Sergei Geruk, Archbishop Theodosy (Snigiryov) of Boyarka
And here are the proud speeches about racial superiority and religious exclusivity: “’O God, I thank Thee,’ and other foolish words…” The Patriarch says such things so openly and pretentiously that it’s even become frightful.

Subscribe
to our mailing list

* indicates required
×