Russian Church has never denied primacy of Constantinople, confesses it in Synodal document—Met. Hilarion

Moscow, January 21, 2020

Photo: pravmir.ru Photo: pravmir.ru     

Despite repeated accusations from the Patriarchate of Constantinople and its supporters, the Russian Orthodox Church has never denied the primacy of the Patriarchate of Constantinople in the Orthodox world, His Eminence Metropolitan Hilarion (Alfeyev) commented recently.

“The Greek-speaking Church sphere has indeed recently accused the Russian Church more than once of supposedly denying the primacy of the Patriarchate of Constantinople in the Orthodox world and of seeking to take its place. However, I haven’t heard a single convincing argument that would prove the validity of these accusations,” the Metropolitan told Interfax-Religion today.

Met. Hilarion is the head of the Moscow Patriarchate’s Department for External Church Relations.

It’s not a matter of denying primacy, Met. Hilarion emphasizes, but a question of how to understand it. The Russian Church’s understanding of primacy can be found in the document, “The Position of the Moscow Patriarchate on the Problem of Primacy in the Universal Church,” which was officially adopted by the Holy Synod of the Russian Church in December 2013, Met. Hilarion notes.

“It is clearly stated there that after the Great schism of 1054, the primacy of honor in the Orthodox Church belongs to the Patriarch of Constantinople,” the DECR head said.

Moreover, the Russian Church is perhaps the only Local Church that confesses Constantinople’s primacy on such an official level: “By the way, the Russian Church is one of the few Local Churches, or maybe the only one that recognizes the primacy of Constantinople not only in words, but in a special document having a Synodal status.”

“However, over the past 100 years, the Patriarchate of Constantinople has developed a doctrine of primacy that actually copies the Roman Catholic model of the Church structure,” as most clearly presented in the report, “First Without Equals,” by Metropolitan Elpidophoros (Lambriniadis), now the Archbishop of the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America.

“Of course, this understanding of the ‘primacy’ of the Constantinople Throne is rejected by the Russian Church as not corresponding to either the Tradition of the Church or Orthodox ecclesiology. But, unfortunately, this understanding of primacy prevailed upon the Phanar and led to the invasion of Ukraine. As a result, we were forced to cease communion with the Church of Constantinople,” Met. Hilarion concluded.

Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Vkontakte, and Telegram!

1/21/2020

Comments
Joseph Lipper1/22/2020 9:24 am
Why does the Synod's document insist on the "Problem of Primacy" in the title? Is primacy within the Orthodox Church somehow problematic? Did the Apostle Paul ever refer to a problem of primacy within the Church?
Rako1/21/2020 9:39 pm
I think that this article may be misleading because it is in English. The Russian term is likely perventsvo, meaning firstness. This would make sense because it is well known in English that the ecumenical patriarch is first among primates. But the term Primacy in English is more ambiguous or potentially misleading it seems to me because a primate in English church language is the head of the church like how we have primates for each of our local churches. So to use the term Primacy in English might imply that he is the primate of the whole church which is not what Orthodoxy has taught and certainly is not the teaching of the Russian church, if I understand it correctly.
Here you can leave your comment on the present article, not exceeding 4000 characters. All comments will be read by the editors of OrthoChristian.Com.
Enter through FaceBook
Your name:
Your e-mail:
Enter the digits, seen on picture:

Characters remaining: 4000

Subscribe
to our mailing list

* indicates required
×