OCA Archbishop of Alaska defends statue of first Russian governor of Alaska

Sitka, Alaska, July 20, 2020

Photo: adn.com Photo: adn.com     

Among the latest targets in the mob movement to remove historical monuments throughout America that has gained steam since the tragic death of George Floyd is the statue of Alexander Baranov, the first Russian governor of Alaska, that sits outside the Sitka City Hall.

Nearly 100 people rallied in front of City Hall on June 23, calling for the statue to be removed, and the Sitka Assembly voted 6-1 last Tuesday to move the statue from its prominent spot in the town.

Baranov was the first chief manager of the Russian-American Company and directed the expansion of Russian authority in coastal Alaska during the late 18th and early 19th centuries. The original Tlingit inhabitants of Sitka burned the settlement in 1802, though Baranov reconquered the site in 1804, laying the groundwork for continuing Russian rule.

His statute was donated to Sitka in 1989 and has been controversial with Native leaders ever since, who are now calling for it to be removed to a museum, “where a fuller story can be told,” in the words of the Sitka Tribe of Alaska.

Among those defending Baranov and his statue is His Eminence Archbishop David (Mahaffey) of Alaska of the Orthodox Church in America.

In a letter to the editor of the Anchorage Daily News entitled, “Don’t blame Baranov,” published on Friday, December 17, Abp. David argues that, while admittedly true history of Native Americans in Alaska “has often been overlooked or even hidden from the history books,” to remove Baranov’s statue would only further damage the state’s sense of history.

“I feel that removing the statue of the first Russian Governor in Alaska will not change anything and even cause a greater loss of the history of our state. Rather, would it not be better to resolve the issue in another manner? We often forget how the Natives of Alaska were treated by the Russians compared to the way they were treated by the United States authorities following the purchase of Alaska in 1867,” he writes

The Russian-controlled company brought the people the Orthodox faith and built schools, hospitals, places of worship, and community centers for the betterment of the people of Alaska, who were equally protected under Russian law, His Eminence writes.

The Russians also sent many natives to receive higher education and produced native priests, iconographers, and education leaders for each community. “Said another way, they treated these ‘Americans’ as equals, not slaves.”

While it is true that fur-harvesting Russians often took advantage of the Native Alaskans, their way of life was also improved under Baranov, Abp. David writes.

“Was he perfect? No, and neither were any of his successors. But compared to the treatment of these Alaskans under the supervision of those sent to Alaska to make them ‘real’ Americans under Sheldon Jackson, the difference is dramatic,” the hierarch continues.

In conclusion, “If the City Council of Sitka wants to consider doing anything to help ease the offense suffered by Alaska Natives, it should be the removal anything related to Sheldon Jackson, not Alexander Baranov,” Abp. David writes.

Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Vkontakte, and Telegram!

7/20/2020

Comments
Jason7/22/2020 3:27 pm
Herman: Did you read what the bishop said about Sheldon Jackson? He pointed out that it was worse for the natives under him and his heavy-handed "Americanization". Also, this can't be compared to Lenin and Sverdlov. A statue of Lenin is about the same as a statue to the antichrist, and naming a province after Sverdlovsk would be like naming it after Judas or Pontius Pilate. Baranov was simply a governor. He was a man of his time, also. He was not anti christian--he was a heavy-handed governor, far from the tsar. Remember that it took a year for a letter to get to St. Petersburg from Alaska in those days, so it was hard to complain about despotic governors.
Herman7/21/2020 1:38 am
Jason: Relax, my friend. I am not a liberal BLM supporter. Did you read the bishop's letter? That's what I am reacting to. The statue of Baranov is there - I see no reason to remove it, however, I see no reason to defend the bloody legacy of Baranov (a man who once oversaw the torture and murder of a native Alaskan on Pascha). My mere suggestion - if they do take it down, maybe they should put one up for St Herman in its place - a man who truly dedicated his life to the Alaskan people. My personal opinion is that I do not like to see an Orthodox bishop defending a man who was the main persecutor of my patron saint. Why do we, as Orthodox Christians, want statues of people (Lenin, Stalin, Baranov, etc.) around that were persecutors of our Faith? This is why Russia has been renaming streets and provinces (such as Sverdlovsk, the murderer of the Royal Family) that were named during the Soviet period. This is not about rewriting history. We should remember our history, and speak openly about it. But do we need statues of Lenin, or Hitler, for that matter? Didn't the Slavic peoples toss all of their idols and statues of pagan gods into the rivers when they converted to Orthodoxy?
Jason7/20/2020 11:17 pm
So, Herman, what's next? Defund the clergy? Are you jumping on the "tear down all the statues" bandwagon along with the rioters? Scary to see that an Orthodox Christian has been infected with this "black and white" mentality that thinks it a great accomplishment to destroy our country's historical monuments. To the contrary, Alaska needs to remember its Russian history, and that means taking the bad with the good. St. Herman had no enemies because he was a saint. Saints do not hold grudges (or tear down monuments). Learn from your heavenly protector how to deal with these things.
Herman7/20/2020 5:23 pm
Take it down, put one up of St Herman in its place. Interesting and bewildering to see this bishop defending Baranov, saying "Oh well, he wasn't as bad as Jackson...the Russians weren't as mean as the Americans were!" which takes the focus off of the personality of A.A. Baranov. He doesn't even mention St Herman in his letter to the editor at all. By objective standards, Baranov was a brutal man, and terribly exploited many of the native Alaskans, and was an enemy of St Herman of Alaska (my patron saint). Baranov hated St Herman. "In their reports to the Synod the monks complained that Baranov, "having burdened the entire population of both sexes with infinite difficulties in working for his company, none less out of envy of the people's great love for us since their love undermined his great power and command over them." This hatred was directed most of all at the monk Herman...Father Herman particularly actively fought for the interests of the enslaved natives. The documents state that he, "a simple monk, showed himself to be an almost perfect Russian Las Casas, but his zeal was entirely without success, since the law of the mighty could not be swayed in this case by the conviction of truth." What was Baranov's attitude towards St Herman? - "The most caustic of the hermits has particularly intruded upon us. He is not compared with Marakii; he is called Herman - a hack writer and a chatterer. Although he does not leave his seclusion for anyone nor for Church, avoiding the temptations of the world, he penetrates everywhere into not only the daily but the nightly activities and thoughts of each one of us." How did Baranov spend his time in Alaska? - "He continued to support his Russian wife and children, who had moved from Siberia back to live near St. Petersburg. In Pavlovskaya, Baranov took an Aleut woman as mistress and had three mixed-race children with her. After learning that his wife had died in 1807 in Russia, he married his mistress, legitimizing their children." (Wikipedia) The other quotes are taken from the book "Herman: A Wilderness Saint" published by Holy Trinity at Jordanville. You can read the book to find out more about the brutality of Baranov, and his persecution of St Herman and the Orthodox mission and native peoples, who St Herman with great love defended and gave us life for.
Here you can leave your comment on the present article, not exceeding 4000 characters. All comments will be read by the editors of OrthoChristian.Com.
Enter through FaceBook
Your name:
Your e-mail:
Enter the digits, seen on picture:

Characters remaining: 4000

Subscribe
to our mailing list

* indicates required
×